Depends on connections. Only HDMI will support HD on a telly AIUI, VGA co= nnections may be relatively fuzzy.
rusty
Depends on connections. Only HDMI will support HD on a telly AIUI, VGA co= nnections may be relatively fuzzy.
rusty
But there seems to be a bug if you prefer a vertical taskbar (as I do). Some windows partially disappear behind the taskbar when you drag like that.
Interesting - using the WinKey and left/right arrows the condensed windows adjust their width accordingly on my setup.
Have you also tried shaking a window by the scruff of its titlebar?
You need several others open to see the effect.
This one?
Someone mentioned using a tv. Be aware that they give low resolution compared to pc monitors
NT
to pc monitors
really?
1920x1080 is as good as most monitors if not better. just be sure you use dvi/hdmi.
Is that resolution? Or an expression of pixel dimensions?
That's what I have (but the old model). We've got a bunch of them at work, old and newer, and they seem pretty good.
Andy
Its a dimensionless pair of numbers. Its one way of comparing similarly sized screens as to what the should be able to display.
Start left does indeed go to left - but then it goes to restore, then right, then maximised. It cycles. Ditto right.
Andy
+1.
My TV makes a fine monitor, running on VGA, except that I have to sit too close to be able to reach the laptop keyboard to use it much. Good for videos though.
Andy
And if you've got your desktop spread over more than one monitor, it cycles through all of the options on all of the monitors!-- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked.
That's the beastie, also here:
Many thanks to all who have replied to my OT post - proof that uk.d-i-y contains more accumulated wisdom than many of the more specialised groups!
I should perhaps have pointed out that this monitor will be connected to a laptop, and used in conjunction with the laptop's own screen - as is the one which it will replace. The only external monitor connection on the laptop is a 15-pin D-sub (VGA) - so it would be slightly complicated to have more than one external monitor, which I wouldn't want anyway.
I provided slightly duff gen in my original post in that my current monitor actually has an aspect ratio of 5:4 rather than 4:3. I would like a monitor whose screen is at least as tall as the existing one, but about 50% wider so that I can get two A4-sized (or bigger) windows side by side. On re-doing the sums, it looks as if I should be able to achieve this with a 24" monitor rather than 27" - particularly with something like the Dell U2412M which has a 16:10 rather than 16:9 aspect ratio. Some of the 27" models suggested have a very high resolution (2560 x 1440) and I doubt whether they would work through a VGA connection, and the small dot pitch would make default text quite small.
So I'm now homing in on 24", with the Dell U2412M top of my short-list. Does anyone know of any just cause or impediment which would mitigate against buying one of these? [Looking at the reviews, there appears to be an issue with the Dell 3-year warranty if bought from Amazon, but pcbuyit claim to pass on the Dell warranty and are cheaper - but are temporarily out of stock!]
You won't go far wrong with value for money if you buy a Samsung .... I have a Samsung 26" (SyncMaster 226cw) great monitor.
Using an AOC e2795Vh 27" widescreen here; had it about a year,now, and very pleased with it.
Amazon has it for 225 GBP including delivery. There is talk of a new model coming soon, so it might be possible to get the current model somewhat cheaper if you time it right... Or wait to see what the new model offers.
Adobe Photoshop Elements ignores any attempt to half-screen it using keyboard or mouse. It also maximises behind my vertical taskbar.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.