Mag 2.3 and 1.4 hardly constitute an "earthquake". As TNP points out, you get that sort of stuff from lorries or trains passing. And subsidence from coal mines, of which we have lots.
As I said to some other bed-wetter, I larf in your face. Get back to me when you know what it's like being in a proper earthquake.
TimW is just another hypocrite. And a pathetic one at that.
We could look at their papers and return them to their country of origin, if you think that would be a good use of public money. Oh I was forgetting, typically they don't have any. So Libya it is.
Be my guest. I'll provide you with a bucket and spade. Should keep you out of mischief for the next 50 years.
So what *is* your suggestion for providing citizens with energy then?
TimW pointed to an article in the Telegraph without comment. What's all the anger for? TW
What anger would that be then?
Or are you projecting again?
Burning their children?
Mind you burning their parents would be a more renewable resource.
Mike Tomlinson posted
If you remove all previous context when making your posts, don't be surprised if they get ignored as dishonest.
En el artículo , Handsome Jack escribió:
It's called "snipping quotes", something you need to familiarise yourself with.
Prick.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required