formatting link
- posted
5 years ago
Ot And nuclear power was supposed to be cheap!
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Hasn't cost you a penny, Harry.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Not as expensive as windmills or solar power.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Yes what are they going to do now. I heard it over the weekend. Mind you Tosh has been in trouble ever since it got involved with General Electric and stopped doing good consumer goods. Hitachi seem to be going if not gone down a similar route of diversification into stuff they know nothing about. Brian
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Splitting up their tools divisions, in europe Hitachi tools have been sold off as HiKoki, and in the states rebranded as Metabo HPT.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
With renewables or with nuclear?
Nuclear: your starter for 10.
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
It can be solved by East-West electrical power transmission lines.
When you think the wind stops, it hasn't, it has just moved on. Also by energy demand management.
formatting link
ie "Smart Meters"
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
All this nuclear power failing for the reasons I predicted but the brain de ad here can't comprehend.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
What is a "near fact"? Something is a fact or it isn't.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Oh? Another that never considers the future.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Is that so? Your usual ignorance.
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
What? It hasn't cost you anything. Whereas *your* solar panels are costing me.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
And the brand name sold off to rebrand no-name (Vestel) TVs sold by Argos, Amazon etc.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Then more reason to removed the ridiculous subsidies associated with green power. Let the market determine feasibility.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Nuclear power has been subsidised for years shit-fer-brains.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Wonderful pieces of propaganda.
All written by organisations with an agneda.
Harry does suck it all up.
Yes indeedy. No more renewable subsidies. Let the market decide.
And if operators need to organise balancing for reneables , then let them offer less for the renewable nergy .
Intermittent generation isn't worth a cent really.
I bet thsoe studies are not holistic and are comparuing apples and oranges.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
In what way is Hinckley C being subsidised ?
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
The price they are guaranteed for the electricity they generate eventually.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Ah. The price thatr is half what is guaranteed for windfarmns and one third what is guaranteed for solar power?