Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA.

Jan 23, 2008 0 Replies

Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA. Ref. Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts that, =91When body emits Light Energy, its Mass must also Increase=92.


Abstract



To draw scientific conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof Andrew George=92s comments regarding Ajay Sharma=92s work on Einstein=92s Sep. 1905 paper in the published in Galilean Electrodynamics. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein=92s Sep. 1905 derivation contradicts law of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here. Under certain condition Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts



Mass after emission (Ma) =3D Mass before emission (Mb) + (0.04L/10c =96L/ c2) (1) Here ( 0.04L/10c =96L/c2 ) is positive quantity.



Hence =91When light energy is EMITTED, mass of body must also INCREASE =92 Which is NOT justified.



For complete 4 page article vist



formatting link
Email snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com


Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required