Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA.

Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of
Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA.
Ref. Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts that,
=91When body emits Light Energy, its Mass must also Increase=92.
Abstract
To draw scientific conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and
basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof
Andrew George=92s comments regarding Ajay Sharma=92s work on Einstein=92s
Sep. 1905 paper in the published in Galilean Electrodynamics. Ajay
Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein=92s Sep. 1905
derivation contradicts law of conservation of matter under some
conditions. This aspect is justified here. Under certain condition
Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts
Mass after emission (Ma)
=3D Mass before emission (Mb) + (0.04L/10c =96L/
c2) (1)
Here ( 0.04L/10c =96L/c2 ) is positive quantity.
Hence
=91When light energy is EMITTED, mass of body must also INCREASE =92
Which is NOT justified.
For complete 4 page article vist
formatting link
Email snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com
Reply to
ross

Site Timeline Threads

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.