Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA.

Open Letter to Prof. Andrew George, University of DENVER, Dept of Physics, COLORADO, 80208 USA. Ref. Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts that, =91When body emits Light Energy, its Mass must also Increase=92.

Abstract

To draw scientific conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary. But it has not been so in Prof Andrew George=92s comments regarding Ajay Sharma=92s work on Einstein=92s Sep. 1905 paper in the published in Galilean Electrodynamics. Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein=92s Sep. 1905 derivation contradicts law of conservation of matter under some conditions. This aspect is justified here. Under certain condition Einstein=92s Sep 1905 derivation predicts

Mass after emission (Ma) =3D Mass before emission (Mb) + (0.04L/10c =96L/ c2) (1) Here ( 0.04L/10c =96L/c2 ) is positive quantity.

Hence =91When light energy is EMITTED, mass of body must also INCREASE =92 Which is NOT justified.

For complete 4 page article vist

formatting link
Email snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com

Reply to
ross
Loading thread data ...

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.