Everyone goes on about lithium batteries as the goal for cars, etc, and whilst they have a higher energy density, that 'ultimate' performance isn't always needed. Milk floats got by on lead acid batteries, so surely they would be a fine candidate for NiMH replacement (I'm thinking of smaller batteries for a greater load of milk or whatever). Also, speaking to the local Evri delivery guy, he does about 20 miles a day in his Ford Transit, surely that would be an ideal vehicle to be electrified, and NiMH would surely be 'better' in terms of cost and environmental issues than lithium batteries?
So, what I have I got wrong? Is there anything obvious that I am missing / don't understand?
Is Lithium worse to mine and process than NiMH? What about the recycling of each? Other than capacity, are there any operational downsides of NiMH? (I think Toyota use them in their hybrid vehicles)
Thanks in advance,
David Paste.