New gas meter comes, old boiler fired.

Aug 12, 2005 63 Replies

Even Drivel didn't say you'd get a 40% saving on gas - he said *up to* 40% - which is a bit different - and grossly optimistic at that unless you've got a literally 'stone age' boiler. As long as the 'iron lump' can be restored to reliable operation, stick with it - by the time a new boiler has paid for itself in fuel savings, *that* will need replacing.

Simple question, it was. Response completely as expected ;-) You are a masterpiece...

-- Adrian C

Write like an idiot, insult and idiot, then you get treated like an idiot. Haven't you figured that out yet?

Nope. 33% is the least you should expect.

You are totally mad. You don't know much about this game do you?

3 to 5 years?

The OP's description was "a fifteen year old rarely serviced (probably never since new)" boiler so the new boiler may well save 40% on the present gas usage. But servicing the existing boiler might produce a double-digit saving.

What a totally pointless response.

Note it's now changed to 'up to 40%'

Drivel gets all his figures from adverts. Think of him as a double glazing salesman and you won't be far out.

Got any mirrors in your flat?

And this simply gives proof that you're not a pro, but simply a reader of adverts.

If you gave this in writing, you'd be out of business.

Well, the boiler is unlikely to use that much gas when sooted up - if you continue to try and use it - and it does fire up - it will probably explode. ;-)

However, until that point I doubt the efficiency changed at all during the many years where it was working properly.

OK, fine, whatever....

-- Adrian C

I know enough to know that your 3-5 year payback period is totally false.

A realistic fuel saving is nearer 20% - say £80 p.a. on a £400 bill. That will give a payback period of *at least* 10 years - and even that ignores the increased servicing costs of complex condensing boilers.

I will leave it to other contributors to judge which of us is the madder!

I have a 24 year old boiler that's >84% efficient so it would take ages to get the costs of a new one back. There is not a lot to service either, just vac it out occasionally and check the flame is burning OK.

Were other boilers of that era significantly different?

PS. Can I move it to a new location if I build an extension or do I have to fit a new condensing boiler? Its only 50,000 btu so I might just keep it as a water heater (storage) and run the heating off a new one (in the attic?).

It is clear you know this from experience. Took down a few houses in the street.

10/10. Very good. Did someone tell you that at the home?

Did someone tell you to laugh?

Greater than 84% efficient and 24 years old? Make and model please? More like 55% if that.

Stop making things up. Also you would be saving the planet.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required