litres and mpg

Jul 03, 2022 Last reply: 4 years ago 27 Replies

Hogsheads per furlong works perfectly well, provided that you know what good and bad values are for it. I just use mpg because I still have 40 years of figures in my head for the average fuel consumption of every vehicle since whenever.

I no longer have any idea how much fuel is in the car. The capacity gauge is a titchy wee thing that just shows full / half / empty. But I also have a (trustworthy) display for "miles left". The similar display for mpg has become a shorthand for "is the aircon on?" "Is there a soft tyre?" as the consumption is otherwise so stable. It's not even like there's a road round here where you can go over 50 (60 on a good day).

Dimensionally, it's an inverse area: volume divided by length. Similarly, we measure rainfall in inches: volume divided by area.

That only affects the utility of the measure, not the validity.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

No, because it isn't the volume and length of the same entity.

Wrong.

<snipped>

That's a misquote, I actually wrote, "Christ, Rod, you're thick." And to be fair, that's a pretty accurate assessment.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

KPL?

For some reason that singing duo came to mind. who we used to call, rather unkindly, Litres of Pee.

Brian

Thanks for all the fuel duty and VAT :-)

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required