Garden Office Building? What do you recommend?

er ...

I'm sure you're right ...

Thanks for sharing ...

Mary too thick for Gnube!

Because they can. Because they want to.

I have done it. So what ? Not everyone is au-fait or cares about ISO codes anyhow, including some of the banks judging by the state of their FX software. Dave

Refer to

Also look at

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Roof details at

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Because its the first thing someone thought of when they wrote it. Doesnt matter to me if its GBP, UKP, LSD or £. No, not that LSD.

Regards, NT

Bizarre though it sounds, the relevant sub-vomittee (a typo, but too appropriate to correct) of ISO *has* made an ill-judged and (hopefully) ill-phrased pronouncement about collecting "database publishing charges" on the *use* of (maybe only complete and up-to-date collections of?) two-letter country codes. Yes, like in geographical top-level domains. Yes, like in MIME tags for languages on web pages.

Clue-by-fours are being vigorously administered by the W3C, ICANN, and other bodies representing (some aspects of) the interests of Net users. There's probably a suitably incredulous article by John Leyden at theregister.co.uk by now...

Just remember - in international standardisation bodies as in party politics, just because an idea is patently loony on its face doesn't mean it won't get proposed in all apparent seriousness...

Stefek, driftin' along, aiming as always to both entertain and inform ;-)

OK, this tells us what the market is currently like. One of the longest threads we've had for some time, and it's about *sheds* :-)

don't mind him, he's just hitchhiking round one little corner of our galaxy, while the balance of his mind is disturbed by the Awesome Power of his new fjord-grinder, I mean fresian-grinder, no, jute-grinder, dammit, Angle-grinder...

Gnube {too thick for linux}

It'll be pocket fluff next! ;O)

Take Care, Gnube {too thick for linux}

Don't mind 'Im, Icini do that routine before! ;O)

Take Care, Gnube {too thick for linux}

I've just finished digging 900ft of ditch, laying drainage pipes, an alkathene water pipe with five stand points, and installing an armoured garden ring-main with IP65 sockets. I am currently building a 20ft by 20ft fruit cage, containing raised beds for three varieties of strawberry, blackcurrent, redcurrents, a single tayberry and three rows of raspberries. When it rains I am building a computer for my prospective son-in-law and editing 28 hours of digital video taken when my wife and I spent three weeks living with hill-tribe villagers in Thailand.

I don't watch much telly - and I sleep extremely soundly!

Unless you live in a conservation area planning permission is not necessary for "utility" buildings which are not habitable. They must be separate from the house, built entirely within your own ground and meet maximum height limits. (Hence the recent fury over a man who built a games room and gymnasium that was larger than his house. Planning officials could do nothing.)

No, it's mostly off-topic hysteria about something trivial

longest threads

A crossposting to uk.rec.sheds might be fun :~))

Jenny

THe two option I'm consdiering are a conservatory or a "tay" log cabin.

The log cabin is cheaper, though a bit more fiddly as it won't be connected to the house (from

I'm going to attached mine all up to my existing house alarm system and add some cameras. As it will be at the back, the dog (and all the neighbours dogs) will add protection too.

Sad Sid writes

And if you did ask for planning permission, isn't there a risk that the local authority might try to ask for business rates?

What experiences have you had then? Change of use or what?

but why are you sad, Sid?