I have de iced the fan which was solid with ice . Since then both the warning lights are on after restart . Have pressed fast freeze button for 10 seconds but they have staid on . Run freezer but lights stay on . Many Thanks Colin
I don't understand HoH posters - there must be more than one of them, yet they seem to be as a group all cut form the same cloth; incapable of actually asking a coherent question, or even providing the basic information that would make it possible to answer one if they did.
I appreciate that this rant will fall on deaf ears since it's exceedingly rare they ever manage to find their post and the replies to it again in the future, and so in 99% of cases we will never here from them again.
For the avoidance of doubt, why not tell us the make and model of appliance. Give us a clue of what the lights indicate, and how they used to work if now working differently. Perhaps an indication of whether the appliance is actually working so we know if this a major fault in operation or just a problem with the indicators...
+1. I had a look at the site to see if it had any FAQ or other guidance for posters, but decided I could not be arsed to sign up after seeing the unpleasant design.
Where did you find the message you're replying to? There's no line about "for full context" so I don't think it's from HoH, and I can't find the original subject on HoH. I googled for "Frost Free Fan" but found nothing. I googled for archeyboy but found nothing relevant.
"Indexing" at Google takes time. At one time, certain materials were indexed almost instantly. Google turned the knob down on the Indexer, as part of some economy campaign. (Some of what Google does, takes a ton of computers to implement, and with a somewhat limited supply of computers, they would repurpose them to "things that earned revenue". That's why you turn down an Indexer.)
*******
Walk back the headers. You don't need Google, when your USENET client can provide the necessary info.
Nobody seems to keep header view switched on in their USENET client.
The message John replied to, has a reference <MID> like this. When you copy/paste, include the <> bits on the ends too. All of this, to be copied.
Now, when it comes to Path: analysis, I'm no good at that, and can't figure out where anything came from :-) But with references or message ids, the above works after a fashion. When a message has a ton of reference IDs in the header, it can be a lot of work to use Howard in such cases. Using Howard is good for brand new threads, not threads with 500 messages, where the References line is operating in "lossy mode".
USENET clients come with all sorts of strengths and weaknesses. Some, you cannot navigate using <MID> values at all, which forces the usage of Howard as an approximate solution. This also causes problems in groups, where someone will just reference a <MID> value, and half the audience can't "enter it into their Reader and go there". This is why, if I need to point someone to a posting of note, I'd use a Howard linkage. It is in vanilla text format. It's truncated to 10KB or so (that's because the "movie people" tried to abuse Howard as a movie download site, and the Howard operator had to stop them). But, it's better than nothing.
Thank you for that useful information. However when I tried it, it just took me back to the mysterious Re: Frost Free Fan from Archeyboy on HoH with no 'full context' to get back to the start of the thread.
Not sure what google has to do with this. HoH is a web based aggregator of a multitude of unrelated usenet groups.
They have a front page that promotes threads without reference to what group they are from, and highlights a selection of seemingly random threads from various groups - many of them ancient.
If you go to post a question it then lets you select from a range of groups without any clue to what they actually link to. The current list being:
The post dialogue does offer a link to notify the poster of responses, but that is optional.
If you can navigate to one of the group pages itself (there are no obvious links to this from the front page - I can only find them by clicking through to an article, and then navigating up the breadcrumb trail to the top level view of the group). You might see something more recognisable to usenet users like:
formatting link
Off you go, 5771 pages of threads (with no thread hierarchy), and no group specific search... :-)
Remember HoH users are not using usenet clients at all, and probably have no knowledge of usenet or newsreaders. They just see it as yet another web based forum or discussion group with multiple groups.
Might it be possible to simply change the name of the newsgroup forum from uk.d-i-y to something different, such as uk.diy ? Thus putting an end to this problem once and for all?
Do you mean renaming this usenet group? I expect there is a procedure for renaming a group, but I can't see it helping.
It would likely be a 20 second configuration change for web sites like HoH to update the name and resume normal "service".
Also while web front ends to usenet are in some respects sub optimal for users, there is no reason that they can't work well enough to offer a usable service (google groups manages it mostly). It just seems like HoH has been carefully crafted to annoy everyone!
Just out of interest, can anyone using NIN see the first post? I never saw it and get ?The article is no longer available? if I try to download it with my news client. (NewsTap on an iPad).
I only saw John's message at the top of the thread, which is usually because I automatically ignore HoH thread, but even viewing ignored threads I didn't see Archeyboy's original, but I do see that he's actually replied with the model number.
I see that HoH has copied all these wingeing messages on uk d-i-y, making Archeyboy's freezer thread difficult to follow. Hopefully that will put a few people off using HoH!
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.