Energy firms going bust

Oct 29, 2019 Last reply: 6 years ago 15 Replies

Seems as if lots of firms are going to struggle to meet their obligation to pay Ofgem to cover its renewable energy charge. The cash will be used to support renewable energy projects.



That maybe is an explanation as to why my energy supplier is a) not sending bills out (I posted about this a couple of months back) b) difficult to get through to customer services c) haven't responded to my acknowledged complain (they have 2 full working days left to meet the/their 10 day target).



I buy discounted power via offers in advance via Credit card, so today have just bought £26 of power for £18. I'm hoping that if anything goes amiss:



1) I'll be refunded any unused advanced payment (I think this is an Ofgen requirement) or failing that the Credit card company will refund me
2) I'll be able to switch out from whoever Ofgen force upon me fairly quickly.

I see Robin Hood have just had a big bail out

formatting link
maybe the fact that my energy supplier is backed/run/owned by the NZ government might help.



Well, the sun is shining so lots of green energy today, eh ho.



For far too long it's been possible to make a one-way bet as a small energy supplier by offering a cheap tariff. If wholesale prices fall you pocket a profit. If wholesale prices rise you liquidate the company and walk away, leaving Ofgem to pick up the pieces. Ofgem have lately started being a bit tougher on this - see eg

formatting link
But many consumers just chase the lowest price (or greenest spin) without regard to customer service.

Really? Did this come as a surprise when they set up in business?

But often it's the companies with the highest prices that have the poor customer service!

Funnily enough, some 9 months ago, I was talking to EDF who said that this was going to happen. They slightly changed their offers to customers to suggest cheaper deals elsewhere, only if they sustained the discount for a certain period.

I cannot help but wonder though if we might not all still have been better if it was all under government control as a non profit, rather than letting business types cream money off the top. OK so investment has to come from somewhere , but if it was run efficiently then any profit could be reinvested sensibly. Brian

Wasn't that the problem with a utility monopolies in the past - no real investment in the infrastructure for decades? The reason water companies are now fixing/replacing Victorian water pipes and other utility companies have a rolling policy of closing roads around my way for 8 weeks at a time.

Often the problem with Nationalization is that it allows the government of the day to balance the books by not investing regularly.

Well, we seemed to built quite a few nuclear power stations in those days. How many have been built since privatization?

I don't pay much attention to customer service from electricity suppliers, that's just an online "paper exercise".

I'm far more concerned about the quality of service the DNO provides. The company/people who actually maintain the physical means of getting the electricity to me.

Robin snipped-for-privacy@outlook.com posted

It seems unlikely that you can do this without committing some cash to the venture that you will not get back.

The whole money making opportunity for carpet-baggers who probably went to the same public school as many MPs was invented by one of the most cynical con tricks on the general public since [insert Brexit | Clmate Cnamge | Passive Smoking as preferred).

We were told the naughty big five energy companies were confusing us proor mugs by offering "too many cheap rates". Do-gooders like Which and time-served "Labour" politicinans were wheeled up to say how unfair it was to offer us a confusing number of tariffs. So now, by law, the big five could not diversify their tarifss in order to sell to those of us spending five minutes to look for a bargain on a comparison site. Is there any other business where people are not allowed to offer bargains in case it confuses us poor mugs??

Anyway, most of the possible profits to be made from cheap rates are now mopped up by these opportunistic "energy companies" leaving a very small proportion for slightly reduced rates to the public. There are many ways people can start businesses and lose little fi they fail, but gain lots if they succeed, and this is one of them.

I'm generally minded to believe in AGW, but when I see what cynical con tricks our political masters are willing to play on us with the aid of sincere but misguided campaigners I do wonder.

Oh yes. But not a lot of cash. Supply companies were set up negligible share capital. A licence to supply only cost £450 or so. No need to lodge a bond or indemnity. And you could of course both set up the company and work for it, drawing a salary and pension contributions from day 1. Until this year there wasn't even a "fit and proper person" test or checks for sufficient finance.

It took me two plus years of deep research and calculation to conclude that renewable energy was a con, and a further two considering te skeptics case for AGW to conlude the same.

Post the brexit shambles I now realise that polticians do not lie out of expedience occasionally. They and the corporate chiefs lie totally about everything., AGW, Political correctness, social justice - it is ALL lies. We are lied to from the moment we try to find out what is going on till the moment we die. And then they mutter some more lies as we are lowered into the ground or burnt to a crisp.

Who told you the lie about being lowered into the ground or burnt? Soylent Green?

Touché.......

You'd have then thought Robin Hood energy would be a good bet.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required