Very difficult to prove, given the vast majority of cars which need an MOT will have one when being driven on the roads.
The MOT was brought in because of the goodly number of unsafe old cars in use.
Except it was said at the time it had minimal effect on accidents. It was also said, someone driving a defective car would generally do so knowingly and drive accordingly.
>
No, adjacent to corners are safe, even wall to ceiling, but not wall to floor:
Quite easily. And it is rarely pitch black. There is always some light from street lights/moon/clock radio/surrounding properties.
How do you make that out?
6.76 is usual price inc vat 4.50 is offer price inc vatThe difference between 6.76 and 4.50 isn't the vat, it's the discount.
That took me back. I was 50% of Chromasonic Electronics until it morphed ino an Apple dealrship. Happy days. :)
Umm, no. You can compare accident rates for different states in US or aus, some have testing some don't.
In '64 it was needed, but today's mot is a very different animal, as are cars & drivers.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.