Not when I was there a few months ago. Or likely to be.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Buy to lets
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
You're welcome to your smoke free 'gastro-pubs'. I was referring to proper pubs - a bit thin on the ground these days, but they do still exist.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Yes, it's amazing how publicans become chefs overnight. Most of it is straight out of the freezer IME. It's yer ambience that's important, and internet access of course. Spent 7 hours in Wetherspoons at Victoria Station the other day, where you can't even go outside for a smoke.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Oh dear. You must have been desperate. You should have said. I'd have bought you lunch.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Where did you go?
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Nah, I prefer to drink on an empty stomach.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
But we are not talking about an active smokers response, we are talking about so called passive smoking.
Thats one of the benefits actually - smoking prevents excessive ear growth :-)
Please pay attention. I'm simply making a case for separate smoking establishments. Choice. If you dislike smoking you could choose not to patronise tham.
Gambling is also an adiction.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
No I simply said that it was one of many causes. It is an irritant, but that doesn't mean its a health risk. See above.
No I don't, because passive smoking isn't a health risk. It may be unpleasant to some, it may be irritating to some, but it is not a health risk. An irritant of any sort is an irritant - not a health risk.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Indeed they have Dave. Lies, damn lies, statistics & anti smoking proaganda.
If non smokers contract lung cancer (and they do) it is a different type of lung cancer to the one smokers may contract and it occurs in a different part of the lung.
Nicely said.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Who said anything about solids?
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Report them.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Please eff off as you vacant in the head.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Even if it were only that, it would be worth eliminating it from public places.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
He looked at the brochure.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
He seems to think that if he says it often enough it will be true that smoking is harmless and is not a health risk. Talk about being brainwashed.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Can we also ban cheap perfume then? gives me asthma every time I sniff some fat old bag in the supermarket q.
Oh and busses. Does the same.
And grass ..that's pretty lethal stuff. Not "Grass" tho. Thats GOOD for asthma. Thats why they banned it of course.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Absolutely.
Try looking for old bags with more class.
Better to avoid busses anyway.
Best really.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
That's what becomes of re-using your old bags at the supermarket.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Talk about being brain dead. I'm claiming that PASSIVE smoking is harmless.
Anyway, how did you get past my blocked senders list?
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
In message , The Medway Handyman writes
Ah, but I was simply looking for a place to jump in and start a rant