Boiler cover - is it worth it and who to get it from?

You have to shop about for that too. It is nowhere near as expensive as boiler insurance. Mine covers up to £500k rebuilding, etc. and £50k contents + extra all risks for the camera, etc for less than £200. Some of them were three times as much.

I don't have breakdown cover. I don't see the need, having not had a breakdown in the last million miles driven.

Reply to
dennis
Loading thread data ...

We had a letter/notification from Corgi about their Homeplan. They or it said that 'this winter, avoid hassle and save £12.26* every month'

Below that it said 'Exclusive offer Sign up now, and we'll save you £12.26* every month over Homeserve - see the comparison below'

Reply to
BobH

I had a "breskdown" when the car was only 9 months old. Faulty sensor. Previous one was 25 years earlier - caused by a local garage, who done a service, bodging an electrical connection with a matchstick - which fell out.

Reply to
charles

Insurance is only worthwhile for events one can't otherwise cope with finan cially. When you buy insurance, you pay the cost of repair x the odds of re pair, plus the running costs of a large corporation, advertising budget, pr ofit and so on. Its a no-brainer.

NT

Reply to
meow2222

SWMBO has had very very few reasons to call the RAC (we've moved to Autoaid now) out.

The last time was for a car that was a month old. Very very cold on motorway, and the diesel waxed up. They recovered her back to our local dealer (5 mins walk away).

For me, it was when I put petrol in the (diesel) car. [hides]

Reply to
Bob Eager

Easily done.....................

Reply to
ARW

So are they are going to pay you? The Homeserve web site says their top service plan is £9.50/month (For the first year and with a £50 excess)

Reply to
alan_m

Not uncommon

Reply to
alan_m

But for every one that falls into your group there are a number (greater than one) who fall into a group who pay regularly and never need to claim and end up mightily out of pocket, thus paying for all of your repairs, the company admin costs and profit.

Which group does the OP fall into?

Does he feel lucky?

Reply to
CB

Later read the Exclusions etc and yes it is a £50 excess to pay. I have binned the letter now, and so won't be contacting them.

Reply to
BobH

I often tow a caravan, I see it as essential for that at least. The last time I broke down, it was a few month old vehicle and the ECU failed. The manufacturers AA cover dealt with that. The time before was around 1990, when the coil lead fell off, which I dealt with myself. Before that around 1965, when the points failed, my stupid fault, but I was stuck 150 miles from home.

Really not nice breaking down on todays busy and fast roads - so cover is fairly essential.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield

I was only suggesting you use them until the boiler is fixed. And although they may cost a 'fortune' to run it may well be a smaller fortune than paying for insurance you may never need.

Like all these things, it's up to you to work out the pros and cons.

I only insure things I couldn't afford to replace if disaster happened. Like the house itself.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

nonsequitor

NT

Reply to
meow2222

From my perspective, the older the boiler the more likely an easy DIY fix, but perhaps that's not what you meant.

Reply to
Graham.

Engage a good, reliable local gas fitter to do the routine servicing and forget about insurance. I did and when the boiler failed on a cold winter's day he was round within a couple of hours and fixed it (failed gas valve). Don't think he answers the phone on Christmas Day though, but then British Gas would not turn out either.

Reply to
Old Codger

If you meant non sequitur - the older I become, the more essential I see break down cover to be.

Especially with a caravan on tow, a disabled wife with time limits on exposure and two dogs in the car.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield

That would be fine if such cover guaranteed prompt attendance. My past two experiences of breakdown cover (RAC & AA) says it doesn't.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

My final experience which proved to me they weren't worth the bother was a waterpump disintegrating on the M1 just outside London, at about 1300 on a weekday. Took the AA almost 1 1/2 hours to get a recovery truck to us - not pleasant being stuck on a busy motorway.

The recovery truck driver was near the end of his shift or whatever so wouldn't take us and the car home. Instead, he insisted it could be fixed and took us away from London to a small general garage. Who, of course didn't have a pump in stock or were prepared to get one there and then. So had to wait a couple of hours for a second truck to take us and the car home. I'd have preferred to have it taken to my specialist - but by the time we got to London, was closed for the day. So had to pay to have the car transported there later. (I'd just had a minor op on a hand and couldn't do the job myself.)

So to summarise, roughly 6 hours to do a distance of about 30 miles.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Touch wood - the AA have always done me proud when needed.

Reply to
ARW

I did have quite a good opinion of them once. And the RAC, come to that. But it only takes one bad experience to make me decide they're no longer worth it. Might be different if it was something you used regularly so could draw an average.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.