In message , IMM writes
It's been discussed before
So are you saying you get more energy out than you put in ?
That's what >100% really means
look it up on a website ...
Best Condensing boilers
Aug 29, 2004
51 Replies
In message , IMM writes
Well, we try to, but like an old sore, you keep on coming back
In message , IMM writes
No it's you're problem
As usual neither I not anyone else have the slightest idea what you're on about
Or produces more heat output than the calorific value of the gas input?
The obvious one of whether one can DIY or must use a registered installer. The answer was the latter.
.andy
To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Just say I am fitting it myself. That is well within the law.
writes
Maxie, the scale goes over 100%, that is how it is. this turkey never knew. This is fundamental to anyone who is supposed to know about boilers.
Maxie, it is R&R time. Get that far east ticket booked ASAP.
Maxie, there is confusion in your mind! It is your problem, that is clear.
Maxie, stop all this. You and your bike clips.....
Not when it comes to receiving a government grant.
You know that, I know that, they don't know that, and were quite insistent about what their policy is.
.andy
To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
No, just that the "official" calorific value of gas never considered the energy that could be obtained by condensing the water byproduct of its combustion, so it is possible to get a nominal efficiency over 100%. Obviously, you can't get a real efficiency of over 100%.
Christian.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required