Apprentice bollockings for this week

I'm sure youre capabilities are only exceeded by a DEC VAX. I'm glad to have shown you how wrong it is to assault people.

I trust you will not molest your colleagues again?

HN

Reply to
H. Neary
Loading thread data ...

Do you expect to get a badge for that?

Reply to
Steve Firth

No! It's my normal approach. You are still wasting bandwidth BTW!

HN

Reply to
H. Neary

I see, so I'm off topic but you can continue to type crap about assault in a diy group.

I can see it from here.

You started the bandwidth crap, kiddo.

Pfffffffffft.

Oh boy, we have another d*****ad guys. Of all the newsgroups in oyl the woyld, wtf do they choose this one?

Reply to
scorched

It's a nice try Horace, but you just over-trolled yourself.

Reply to
scorched

I find it difficult to comprehend why you continue to post off topic rubbish that has no place in this NG.

I don't want to arge but I think it is youself that was responsible for the original waste of bandwidth.

Shouldn't the "k" in "kiddo" be upper case.

Not a criticism BTW, only trying to assist.

HN

Reply to
H. Neary

I'm sure we all wonder why you do it to.

Nope, you'll find that you started that stupidity, do a search, I can't be arsed to.

Does anyone care?

Sorry Horace, you're over-trolling at each post now. Shame.

Reply to
scorched

Nowt wrong with a good arge.

Who is Yousef?

No that's you.

If the P in prick us something that should be taken.

Gosh but you're full of shit.

Reply to
Steve Firth

I see, when I reply to a post it is wasting bandwidth. When you reply with an off topic rant reposting reams of previous posts it is acceptable. Perhaps you should remove your head from the orifice through which you speak and smell the coffee ?

Reply to
Steve Firth

It has little to do with the post's *what*? Or is that a grocer's apostrophe?

Reply to
Tim Streater

He can have one for being a po-faced moraliser!

Reply to
Bob Eager

If you're going to go on about spelling, get it right yourself.

Reply to
Bob Eager

If you're going to go on about spelling, get it right yourself.

Reply to
Bob Eager

Spelling.

Reply to
Bob Eager

Spelling * 2. Perhaps you're losing your cool.

Reply to
Bob Eager

Assuming it's real that is, and not just some made-up fantasy world.

Reply to
Grimly Curmudgeon

I ws think about this soem time agao so when you see the police rushing about in vans and cars do teh drivers check before speeding off, same with buses, I knew a bus driver and he never instecte4d everything before taking his bus out, but black cab drivers are responsible for thier cabs.

It uis interesting point that as apprentices I don;t think they can be resonsible legally. We had that with a builder who let his apprentice forget tpo cover the whole in teh roof with water then it rained and the bathroonm cieling fell in. Shoudl teh apprentice be blamed or teh roofer for not keeping a better check on the work.

yes I doubt physical vilonece would acheive much but it can certainly be satisfying=B7l ;-)

Reply to
whisky-dave

Tthe apprentice is not legally responsible if someone else drives a van with bald tyres that the appentice has claimed to have checked. By law it's the drivers job to check their own van before they use it. However the apprentices often drive the vans. And they would quite happily drive them with bald tyres and the low oil level light showing on the dashboard etc.

If an apprentice was to be caught with bald tyres the firm could produce the report sheets to show who checked the vans. It stops them claiming the firm was responsible for making them drive a faulty van.

If an electrician is caught with bald tyres then that is his problem. He knows better.

Reply to
ARWadsworth

So sorry, we only speak English here.

Reply to
Steve Firth

I unsist that we keep things that way.

Reply to
ARWadsworth

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.