Panto season already :-)
Here is the standard:
You will note that the standard is an open source ISO standard these days (has been since 2008):
Unfortunately it does ...
Its a proprietary Adobe extension.
I dont think any linux readers support it. Maybe in browser rendering does.
Until 2008 PDF in its entirety was an propitiatory Adobe creation and specification. It was adopted as an ISO standard in 2008. It had JS then, and has it now.
All of them I would expect - firfox and anything Chromium based certainly.
[snip]
Cheers John, appreciate it!
Thanks. Is a master password application safer than not having one and writing the p/w down on a piece of paper? I know that someone can break in and steal that paper, but it is unlikely, whereas a M.P.A. could still technically be cracked, yes? Or is it that a case of extraordinary diminishing returns and not worthwhile for a skint pleb? (I'm assuming that)
I exported my password store from google... .. there are over 1000 passwords in it. I know some are duplicates, but even so generating that many unique passwords would take some work...
Dave
Christ on a bike... What on earth made you put it there in the first place? Hardly secure.
pdfjs.enableScripting BOOLEAN True
A little of this, a little of that.
Paul
Ah. So Mozilla can be told *not* to support it. It looks like it should be disabled 'unless needed'
I'll do that RIGHT NOW... ...done!
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required