On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:55:13 -0400, email@example.com wrote:
Hey, you're right. I knew it looked familiar, but it must have been
40+ years ago that I saw one. He didn't play golf afaik but his
father might have.
I forgot to mention that it says Harshaw ColorPlate on it, but
there's almost nothing about Harshaw in google.
I don't totally know what it is, but golf players
often carry them. My friend Bob Anderson was a big
golf player, but he died a couple years back. Maybe
some one at a golf pro shop can answer your question?
You might get a jargon answer. "Oh, when you bogie
on the back fairway, you need to divot your putt, so
you can play through, and you need one of these." I
guess if you are easy to please and gullible, that
answer will keep you wondering.
OTOH, might be another mechanic tool. Used to adjust
the whippet tappet on the crank shaft piston rod free
play cylinder valve assembly under the distributor
on internal combustion overhead valve engines with
flo jet carburetion fuel delivery systems. Know I'm
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 2:40:13 PM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
I'll take a guess. This may be what he is complaining about...
The original subject line of this thread is "What is this?"
The subject line for your first response reads as follows:
"Re: What is this? (golf tool of some kind)"
It appears as if you are referencing (via "Re:") a thread entitled:
"What is this? (golf tool of some kind)"
There is no thread entitled "What is this? (golf tool of some kind)"
so Gordon is complaining that you are referencing a thread that
Gordon...do I have that right? Obviously I can't see what you are seeing,
so I may be misunderstanding your unhappiness with Stormy's methods.
I don't have a problem with you changing the subject line. Obviously you don't understand that.
I, and maybe many others, do have a problem when the "re: " precedes the renamed subject line giving one the impression there
is an original post -- which there isn't. Obviously you don't understand that either.
Quit acting like a liberal.
You are so totally right that I didn't understand
your concerns. Thanks for making that a bit more
Now, in true liberal form, I need some government
money for all the mental anguish. Have to call my
case worker when I get a moment.
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 5:19:48 PM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
Except that you are not doing it right, at least not in this case.
1 - The subject line of this thread was "What is it". The subject has not
changed, but the question has been answered. Why are you including the
answer in the subject line?
2 - Your use of Re: is the main problem. That is what is screwing up some
newsreaders. Why can't you understand that perfectly.
That has been Gordon's complaint all along.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.