they don't seem to have had one (and for sure don't now - not needed). That case drug on fr several years until it got to the Supremes who pointed out clearly that becasue a beurocrat says something, that ain't good enough.
Harry K
If Saddam hadn't used CBW in the past, I doubt the WMD question could have risen up as far as it did and we might never have gone to war with them. His past use of CBW made the threat more "vibrant."
There might have been an overall *eventual* benefit for the Kurds. Depends on how they perceive their current state of affairs. As for the Iranians - they probably just died without much overall future benefit.
Ever cloud has a silver lining, every tornado contains a lot of loose change.
-- Bobby G.
You must have missed my post where I said my bet is that they will (the plaintiffs) will loose eventually.
Harry K
top-to-bottom
Yep, I missed it. Sorry. I guess we agree it's not as big a leap as it should be. I'm not even sure the EPA should have any authority over private citizens and their homesteads. Most massive pollution is caused by corporate entities.
-- Bobby G.
As an aside, Alan Dershowitz posited the following rules:
Studying the above rules will demonstrate why almost everyone in prison feels they are there on a bum rap.
Ya forgot the mosst important one.
Trials are nt about "justice" it is only about who wins or loses the case.
Harry K
They damn sure didn't die from cancer! QED.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.