>> "Steve Carroll" wrote:
>>> >>>>> >>>>>> A better one is this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 27533 - 23099 = 4434
>>>>>
>>>>> I see. I get 2561 posts for last month.
>>>>
>>>> That sounds more reasonable.
>>>
>>> Something less reasonable: We're less than half way through day 2 of
>>> July and the QT has already posted over 11,000 lines of crap. LOL! >>
>> That's no surprise. Some idiot decides to post a list of traffic
>> offences that we've all seen umpteen times already, and the idiot it
>> concerns (and other idiots - yes, all of you, you're f****ng idiots!)
>> can't resist replying without snipping anything. The only one who did
>> snip was BD, so well done him, the only one to show some common sense. >
> You are of course correct however regarding trimming replies, when dealing
> with a slippery liar like snit, the context needs to be preserved or he
> will post bogus replies, projecting his own faults (ie:reading
> comprehension) upon the poster.
>
> It's also prudent to never use pronouns like he, him and so forth but to
> mention snit by name.
> So never "he can't read".
> Instead use "snit can't read".
>
> Snit has some kind of very serious mental issue, maybe more than one.
> He truly needs professional help and I'm not sure why DB isn't helping > snit.
>
why aren't you