confronted with this scenario in simulator training," Sullenberger said."
version of the 737.
He is still blaming it on a training issue, not a plane issue. Personally I think the planes depend too much on computers and the pilots get lazy, sloppy or can just be stupid and still succeed until something goes wrong.
A while ago Mythbusters did a segment on whether the average person could take control of a plan and be "talked down" if both pilots were out of action. Even with the best help the guys kept crashing the simulator. Then they turned on the computer and both had no problem landing the plane. It made me wonder, how many pilots could actually land that plane without the computer? (particularly young ones who have always had the computer)