Is this mask effective?

Agree. But if a bandana is considered acceptable " to protect others " ... these sports masks wouldn't be any worse. John T.

You would not cluster bomb others when you coughed. So maybe slightly better.

Hi Micky,

You did not happen to come across this same filter without the valve hole?

-T

I read that they are not even recommended as PPE if they have the exhaust vent. I supposed they do get used for some as PPE to avoid excessive fogging of face shields or goggles.

I very much doubt that.

Only stands to reason. What does not get through the mask on it own, builds up on the mask. Then when you cough or sneeze, you blow what you would have blown out without the mask plus everything that has built up on the mask gets blown all over everyone else. So the exhaust hole does help the build up issue

Most masks are almost worthless. The n95 masks are made to work in a contanimated area. They are to keep things out of you and not what you breath out. The virus particals are too small to be filtered going into you.

The home made cloth masks soon fill up with the moisture and then become ineffective.

There was a very good write up on this that was published on Facebook.

They are mostly like many of the feel good things. Like most of the gun and drug laws. Many are on the books, but it is very easy to get the illegal drugs and guns are easy to come by illegally.

Concentrating on all the trivial aspects of wearing masks - - is missing the point !

I strongly encourage everyone to go to a reliable health-department's web site and thoroughly _read_ all the good information there. It is not just about the masks ... it's about staying home when you are symptomatic ; hand washing ; distancing ; etc.

Government medical advice HAS changed over the months - read & re-read the most recent - rather than ignore everything because you can't accept the new reality.

Spreading half-truths and garbage science does not help.

Here's just one example of some government advice < Canada >

but everyone should probably go to your local / state information and do some serious reading.

Masks with valves protects others from the wearer but apparently doesn't protect the wearer from others.

.. exactly ... wrong. :-) John T.

Relying on a writeup on "Facebook" for health advice is so stupid that you don't even need to bother replying to "Ralph" pointless anti-mask diatribes.

Wrong again.

Wow, that means Pence is smarter than you are. Scarey, huh?

It figures that you would get it exactly beackwards.

Must be why surgeons wear them when doing surgery.

Not true of all of them.

Not true of droplets that you expel when talking etc. Which might just be why surgeons wear them when doing surgery.

That's bullshit too. The moisture does in fact trap some virus.

Clearly it mangled the story very comprehensively.

There might just be a reason why full PPE involve masks and why those testing for the virus always wear masks.

Must be why surgeons wear them when doing surgery and why those testing for the virus always wear them.

Bicycle masks appear to be designed to protect wearer from breathing in crap but make breathing out easier. Means to me that they are less safe to those around them as we are told masks are most effective to keep wearers virus in.

Reminds me of the time a Harvard professor on the surgeon generals committee that condemned smoking for causing lung cancer told me that he smoked Larks for protection of the charcoal filter. He later developed lung cancer.

Translation: you don't have an argument to present.

Already presented, and already ignored by you.

What makes you think that *everything* on there gets *everyone* else and that not perfect means not worth even trying?

Those masks are not to protect others as much as they are to protect the wearer. Early on I read that even the PPE masks with exhaler ports are not recommended for this application.