What if: The third person used number two's gun to kill both #1 and #2? After all, it's his word against nobody's at this point.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Ah, the enjoyment of gun ownership and use...
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Excellent point. I think it's time to give Dexter a call.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Heh, I thought about that possibility too.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
formatting link
(flailing wildly) pant, pant, pant! I'm sure there's a pony in all this horseshit somewhere ............ dig, dig, dig, ......................................
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
What does "training" have to do with "owning"?
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
If you would learn to post, I wouldn't trim it out. As it is you make a hash of conversations.
It really sounds like you were in agreement. Hence, my question.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Harry K
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Unfortuanately for you that _is_ the sense of his post.
Harry K
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Ooooo, did I touch a sore point? Note that I did not snip any of that just so that you can get your panties all wadded up again.
Harry K
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
How about you come back in about 20 years when you're all grown up and ready to have an adult conversation.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:33:09 -0500, Nate Nagel wrote Re Re: Ah, the enjoyment of gun ownership and use...:
Well said Nate.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
It was always homicide. Homicide is not always murder. Homicide could be the execution of a prisoner under a lawful warrant or the killing of an enemy soldier in time of war. Homicide could be killing in self defense or via drunk driving. Homicide could result from a mistake on the operating table.
"Homicide" is the killing of one human being by the act or omission of another and is NOT, per se, a violation of law.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
What diversion? You create a doesn't belong here post laughing about the loss of human life and then add childish name calling to make yourself look even sillier.
Seems you have some issues following the don't belong in this newsgroup threads you keep on starting. Not sure where you got the snippet from but it wasn't from anything I wrote.
What is pertinent about inappropriate posts for this group? Maybe you can have someone show you the numerous appropriate places you might go to post your definitely nothing to do with home repair material.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Another diversion - another way to say "I surrender".
Wana try again?
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
The movie "no country for old men" provides some insight into that subject.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
Too bad that banning guns, does NOT in any stop the fact that innocent people get killed. On the other hand, banning guns, only makes innocent people less able to defend themselves against the criminals.. But that's an issue that such as you conveniently ignore even though far more people are victimized when they are made defenseless by such as you.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
And do tell us, when was the last time that happened ? I have never heard ANY "gun enthusiast" declare such nonsense.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
What diversion? I understand why you snipped out the almost the entire reply I made because it makes you look so silly in not even being able to follow the thread you started....
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
formatting link
You really sick.
- Vote on answer
- posted
12 years ago
One can only hope that he drives a car, since that increases by a factor of
50+ his chances of "being take out" by another driver than by a gun-owner