Don't be all that concerned. You may find that you don't miss it. I've
quit watching TV for the most part and find that I have more important
things to do.
As long as you can get a couple of good newspapers, communicate with folks
via E-mail, and visit frequently with friends, you should be happy. These
newsgroups can afford an interesting passtime as well.
TV (radio too for the most part) is just trash with all variety of trashy
people jabbering away at you. Get it out of your life if you can; you'll be
a better person ---- yes, you will.
Most broadcast TV is trash, but cable and sat have many very good
informative channels. Discovery and History Channel are two of my
favorites. Did you catch the 2 hour show on the life of Einstein? Some of
the travel shows? While I'm proud to say I've never watched Desperate
Housewives, I do enjoy Modern Marvels, How Its Made, and similar shows.
I'll second that. I watch a few hours of network TV each week (reality
shows and DH not included), but more often than not, am tuned into one
of the non-OTA channels. I couldn't justify the $46 a month for Satt
just for the conventional networks- I'd make do with a roof antenna.
I have had this same discussion with a few of my TV-snob relatives that
won't even have a set in the house.
"aem sends".... ! Haven't seen that used that way in many a year.
That tells me you are a "Telecommunicator" of the old school; either
government or military.
Having at least one TV around the house was always good; for emergency
purposes if nothing else. I suppose that purpose fades with the
disappearance of local broadcasting. Of course broadcast radio remains (if
they could stop their commercials long enough to send word out that
NuclearWar had just begun in Wash., D.C., NYC and LA !!)
If a nuclear war were to begin, I don't think NYC or Los Angeles would
the list....unless you meant Louisiana?
Why do you think they would not be on the list???
DaddyDave sends . . . . . . . .
Because of Barksdale Air Force Base.
========================================================I assume you mean that Barksdale would be of far higher priority above LA
D.DaddyDave sends . . .
wrote in message> Because of Barksdale Air Force Base.
Correct. Take out the biggest military threats first.
I suppose you are correct. NYC and the SanFran and the L.A. would
likely be the last on their list since our enemies have so many friends
McDave sends . . . .
Yes. Those are about the only channels I watch; or I'll watch CSPAN if I
just happen to catch them in a live committee-hearning situation on a
subject that interests me.
I missed that Einstein show you mention. Wish I had known about it.
the national geographic channel is wonderful, air emergency, seconds
to disaster, and my new favorite show fixing big things.
tonights new episode is a new engine being installed in a cruise ship,
had one episode where a 747 gets disassembled to replace the pressure
bulkhead, and another showing how high tension lines are serviced with
the power on
Too late, it has already been delayed a couple of times. Now all the
expensive equipment is in place, there is pressure to get a good emergency
communications system up and running and they need some of the bands this
will free up to do so.
| if enough voters call and complain the changeover will get delayed a
| few years.
| a major advertiser is political adds, congress needs your eyeballs on
| that screen, to get re elected
You MAY gain a bit in the spectrum. But, I don't think digital video
conserves bandwidth over analog. And, I'll be happy to discuss this with
anyone that knows anything about modulation methods and spectrum use.
Nixon.D wrote:> You MAY gain a bit in the spectrum. But, I don't
think digital video
A standard 6 Mhz analog channel can transmit 19.4 megabits of
That will support 5 standard definition channels of encoded video
only one channel of analog video was provided.
In my rural area, we have several stations that are sending 3 or
where only one existed, and one station that is sending 5. It is
the video decoder, for channel 8, as 8-1 , 8-2 , and 8-3.
High Definition video takes more space, so only one ( I think ) HD
can be sent in the 6 Mhz bandwidth.
Like yourself, I care not for High Definition. I like black and
white TV and
love the way my car radio sounds, so I'm not likely to be a customer
the "latest and greatest" if cosmetics are the only plus. I don't
seeing the pimple on the nose of Barbara Streisand....
HOWEVER, I love getting several times the number of channels. I
they don't all end up sending football games or Three Is Enough re-
just to fill up the space, tho....
If you want to pursue some details, just google " DTV Bandwidth"
you'll get enough hits to slake your lust for a long time....
Andy in Eureka, Texas
OK. I sort of suspected something like that was the truth of it all.
Years ago I was up to speed on the bits of info. that could be passed within
a given bandwidth. Seems the basic tenets of modulation have not changed,
just the nature of what makes an acceptable signal...........
Car radios . . . Yep. The best, by far, audio we have around here is
that we hear in our car. Outstanding.
But keep in mind that we have something today that they didn't have back
then: efficient compression techniques (like MPEG, etc.) that
effectively increase the number of bits without requiring more
bandwidth. Dunno what kind of compression HD uses, but I'm sure it uses
something pretty sophisticated. (Not to mention error detection and
Washing one\'s hands of the conflict between the powerful and the
powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.
OK. What is MPEG ?
That probably tells you how long I've been away from the nuts/bolts of the
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.