Seems to me that there would be far better, low maintenance ground
covers available than grass. You do realize that the hard work will come
*after* you lay the sod, right?
Thanks! We're new to lawns/gardens (our lot is basically an acre of
woods) so this did not occur to us, and wasn't mentioned in the
site-prep articles we read. Sounds like a great idea for serious
Please see my response to another poster. We are very open to the idea
of groundcover. We have talked to 2 landscapers, both of whom suggested
grass (even though we told them we would consider grass OR groundcover).
We are in Florida. The area to be covered is a bit shady and quite
damp. We need something that will hold on to the soil NOW, not
something we will have to cultivate carefully for 6 months in order to
get it to spread. We are on a sloping site and have problems with
erosion. We are working on the drainage (retention wall put in today!)
but definitely need a ground cover that will be off to a running start!
Joseph Meehan wrote:
It is a lot of work to pull the weeds. Work when the soil is damp,
after a rain. It would certainly help to have more than one person
doing the task. Listen carefully to your local experienced people
about the various types of grass that grow well in your climate.
Using the best grass type for your climate will greatly reduce your
maintenance chores and increase your chance of a nice lawn.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.