Not so much recently. We have a young smiley face on fascism now, and a new PR team, but things could change.
Used to be Oz was deferential to teachers on immigration. Is that still true?
Lee, you must have seen
Billy wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.ne t.au:
no, i hadn't! thanks! :) lee
You don't need to wonder, we will still lead. ~25-28% is hardly all. Beside what are they going to do, repossess us? Its not like we sold out our mining companies to em.
You see gunner, this is what worries me. You don't have a freakin' idea as to what is going on.
And most of our $4TRILLION debt was racked up under President Monkey Smirk, in order to give us guns and butter, in the short term, while he pushed his "vanity wars".
These things go in cycles, sometimes it's teachers, sometimes, doctors, it could be plumbers this month, whatever the Powers forgot to train 5 years ago.
David
Still asleep at the wheel Billy? as in most of your posts, you invariably fail to read through your "cites" as well as skip over a lot of facts. Finish readin the entire news article you posted before you stupidly pop off again.
Where you went to school is ~25 % considered all ?
President Monkey Smirk? As always what has that diversionary BS have to do with your misunderstanding of facts.
$4 trillion? you are sooo underestimating, try closer to $11 T. there slick
You have the right to to use facts, Billy, you do not have the right to make them up! her are some crib notes for ya, but remember to verify them they are Jan 2009, at least their not in your old time zone of 1909.
So you agree that Australia isn't selling it's mining interests to the Chinese. Glad you came to your senses. Not that it is the Chinese's fault that everybody and his mother's brother has picked China to be the manufacturer to the world. If we want them to make stuff cheaply that we can buy at Wally World (Walmart), then they need raw materials. That should be obvious even to a blundering blockhead like you.
I'm sorry, were these the ones on pesticides?
Now you are referring to FarmI's fair characterization of US debt.
Pictures are worth a thousand words. See Monkey Smirk.
Gunneria, don't call me slick. You're right. I shouldn't have used the numbers that YOU provided.
It's interesting to note how under the former party of fiscal responsibility (GOP) US debt has skyrocketed since Raygun, with only a brief correction during the Clinton years, and then it was back to "borrow and spend" as usual, transferring the wealth to the rich.
Wonder what we could do with the savings from canceling the privatization of government functions (which in private hands need a profit) and only spending a quarter of the world investment in weapons, instead of the 50% that we do now.
Otherwise:
US Military Budget
I think you would be happier over in tx.guns.
In any event, this is a gardening group, so piss off. We're done here.
Billy, ya gotta practice that innocent victim part a bit more. It doesn't appear very plausible, especially for a politician such as yourself. I do have to ask, what is up with you always trying covering your tracks after your many faux pas with these extraneous BS links, do you honestly think that it works well for ya? It is pretty obvious you just google search and it really doesn't make you appear any smarter. But hey look at the good side, you were only off by $7 trillion.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.