Put my new recipe for Salsa Verde up on my website. After six attempts, I finally hit on the secret: reduce it slightly on the stove to thicken it. Enjoy!
formatting link
- posted
19 years ago
New Salsa Verde Recipe
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Stop spamming, you mewling pissant.
You web site sucks. You suck. Your peppers probably even suck.
Penelope
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Thanks for taking the time to get back to me, Penelope, I know how busy you are. Always a treat to get your upbeat and constructive feedback, it means a lot to me.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Judging from the responses, I've decided that Penelope is a bot, and I've quit listening and turned on my ignorebot. I could be wrong; it's no longer noteworthy when I am.
Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Well, the site does suck... Nothing personal.
John!
Gary Woods wrote:
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
I agree, it sucks, and that recipe? I've never had a salsa that didn't have onions, but then again I've never had every salsa made. Please stop hawking that god-awful site here. Maybe you should post your recipes on rec.food.recipes. Another little piece of advice is to be literate when you post. That spell-check feature can sure help.
Pealed?
Merriam-Webster defines "peal" as;
possibly you could "give out peals" or "utter or give forth loudly" as you peel.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
I re-read the recipe and it did in fact have onions, so my apologies on that....but I stand by the rest of my post....
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
You know, I love peppers. I love the whole process of growing them, from pressing the seeds into the soil right up through harvesting and enjoying them. I like reading about them, and tracking down new or different varieties. I'm growing more than
30 different varieties this year. Some of those are from seed, and some I'm buying the plants.So, I perked right up when I saw someone posting with chili in their name. This guy's not a chili lover, though. His site is full of ads he gets paid for when someone clicks on them. He's a spammer, plain and simple; and all his posts to this group are to lure you to his web site so you can fill his wallet by clicking on the ads. Sadly I've seen more and more of this, everything from this maladroit boob to very cleverly done blogs. I pursued a complaint against one woman, found out she'd been posting to *97* different gardening email lists. She was good, too. Her web site was blog style, and she had links in the text that appeared to be links to pictures or more information; but they were all links to commercial sites.
Yuck, I hate spammers worse than I hate thrips!
Penelope the 'bot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Heh...Paging Mr. Murphy, paging Mr. Murphy....
Penelope, or it the 5th Law of Posting to Usenet?
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Must be a Pinetree Gardens fan.
Penelope the 'bot
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Die, spammer, die.
Penelope
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Ya know, Penelope, you've come at me with both barrels today, and I've tried to be polite but I'm not really sure what set you off. So I looked around at your other posts on USENET to try to figure out if I should take it personally or not. Clearly I shouldn't.
I see you post on soc.singles.moderated A LOT. So I'm thinking to myself: why is such a sweet and demure woman single? Then it hit me. You're probably not single because you're sweet and demure. You're probably single because you're such a hateful, spiteful bitch. Now it all makes sense...
Tell you what: let's just avoid each other around here, okay? Clearly your only interest is spewing snarky, hateful bile, and me... well... after reading many of your posts I'm quite sure I'm not interested in a damn thing you have to say, you hateful hag. So ignore me in the future and I can assure you that you can expect the same from me.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
A little defensive here? The thing about being defensive, it shows you are wrong. Take the critique and make it not suck. And yes, you are spamming.
John!
urbanChiles wrote:
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Don't some people create a site, then hope that visitors will click on the banner ads so that their site will make a buck? That might be Scott's true aim.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Well, if his marketing plan includes namecalling, he should do well, at least at that.
He has ads "just to cover his hosting expenses". Altruism at its peak.
John!
Ken Anders>>Well, the site does suck... Nothing personal.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
No, I haven't. If you consider this "both barrels" I suggest you take great caution not to really irk me.
Yes! I do. I love those people. Why don't you post your spam over there? They'll love it! Just ask Singles Reflection Guy.
I see you read for content about as well as you post it, that is to say, not at all.
So, Scott, did you and Donald have a big 'old time last night?
No. You're a spammer. You should be flamed and harassed endlessly.
I am a Big Meaniehead.
Penelope, haggish meaniehead 'bot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
il Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:56:31 -0500, "Ken Anderson" ha scritto:
Well I'm sorry, but what part of a banner ad forces anyone to click on it? Have i missed some form of mind control - oh wait - that's rabid consumerism isn't it. I missed that bus...
I surf with graphics off so often, that my browser has forgotten what they are ... ;-)
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
That's kinda beside the point. This guy hasn't added anything to the newsgroup; no suggestions, no stories, no advice, nothing. The only thing he has posted besides links to his web site are his silly attempts to chastise me. And he posted the same thing on several of the rec. newsgroups. He's spamming to lure people to his site so he can make money off of it.
He's a spammer, he should suffer.
Penelope