Watching a neighbor's brick entrance columns lean outward over the past couple years has got me thinking. The mason who built them clearly didn't dig down far, and now one pillar has a visible gap where it's pulling away from the driveway edge. Classic frost heave pushing things around whenever the ground freezes and thaws.
So here's what I keep going back and forth on. Is it better to dig down below the frost line and pour a proper footer, even if that means going deeper than the column itself really needs? Or does it matter more what you put under the footing, like compacted gravel versus just pouring straight onto undisturbed clay? I've heard arguments both ways. Some folks say undisturbed virgin soil is the whole game and disturbing it causes more problems. Others say a bed of compacted stone helps with drainage so water isn't sitting under the footer all winter.
Around here the frost line is supposedly around 42 inches, but I've seen footings half that depth hold up fine for decades, and others at full depth still heave. Does depth really trump everything, or is drainage and soil type just as important? Genuinely curious what the folks who pour footings regularly would say.