CNN: "Toyota's president Akio Toyoda apologized for the gas pedal problems that have forced the recall of millions of vehicles, Japanese media reported."
What a difference from the approach other auto manufacturer's have used when faced with a major problem. Apologize. The norm has been deny it. deny it. deny it. Then grudgingly fix it while continuing to deny a real problem.
My first car was a Honda Civic. Honda recalled the fenders because mud collected up underneath and rusted the fender out from the inside. They replaced my fenders, no charge. They stood by their product and when I needed a new car I remembered what happened and my new car was another Honda. Perhaps American auto-makers do not stand behind their product like others which explains why Japanese owners are so loyal to their brand.
Yep. Japan gained their foothold in the American auto industry during the early to mid 1970's when Detroit started building disposable cars. During that period we owned a 71 Chevy Vega GT and I needn't say anything more (Except it was Motor Trend's car of the year - Yipee!). After a combined 6 months in the shop waiting for parts and repairs, we traded for a new 74 Cutlass Supreme. In four months we started seeing rust around the opera windows. GM "fixed" that and it immediately restarted. The electrical system was a mess. When we got rid of it three years later the entire car was rusted out. The trunk latch was held in place with bondo. That is when we traded for a Volvo which we drove 130K miles and turned it over to our daughter for a college car and she put 40+K more on it before trade. When Volvo out priced us (2 cars later) we turned to Hondas, and our current
160,000 mile Toyota. Other than normal maintenance (shocks, brakes, etc) the Toyota has NEVER BEEN REPAIRED! In fairness, our other vehicle, a Chevy Duramax has also been very good at 42K miles. Also, by comparison, we slipped an '86 Blazer in with the Volvos and drove it for 8-10 years. But it saw three radiators, a steering sector, two water pumps, etc, etc, etc.RonB
Well, I'd say it's not been much different afaict. They started out w/ "no problem" and "driver error" and blaming floor mats for the problem and have only now come out since it's clear that it's going to be a major financial hit so they're trying to recover.
That said, the congresscritters trying to make hay w/ hearings, etc., are entirely out of line, too...
--
Yes, they danced a bit too. But a public apology is not common in that industry. Attorneys usually won't stand for it. It probably speaks to the Japanese honor system. But it still outclasses the approach Ford, Chevy and Audi used. "Nothing really wrong, they made us fix it."
Actually the floor mats wher part of the problem the rest of the problem is the American company made parts.
Ford in China too has suspended production and sales of their larger vehicles. Apparently CTI located in Elkhart IN is the maker of the pedals with the problems. I would not rule out other auto makers in the near future. Apparently the Pontiac Vibe has the pedal also.
Toyota has been denying it. They had a smaller, quieter recall last year for a related issue. Supposedly the rugs were catching the gas petals.
Isn't that president supposed to commit harry carry after a major embarrassment such as this?
R> CNN: "Toyota's president Akio Toyoda apologized for the gas pedal
The first year that the Ford Focus was manufactured there were 156 campaign notices that the dealers had to deal with. Do you recall the last Toyota recall? GM had an ongoing repair campaign on most any one of their vehicles when I worked for an Oldsmobile dealer for 10 years in the lat 70's and
80's. I don't recall Ford ever admitting that their older Mustangs and Pintos were bombs on wheels and were likely to explode when rear ended. The later Crown Victoria's had the problem also. Police departments dropped them like used condo__.As far as Toyota claiming driver error, I don't recall that being said but would agree that drive error is what results in a majority of the accidents caused by a stuck accelerator pedal. If you are driving you should know how to stop the vehicle, simply turning off the ignition, shifting into neutral, or pushing in on the clutch should not be that much of a request to stop a vehicle. And there is the brake pedal.. Tests shown in Car and Driver indicate that a V6 Camry requires 16 additional feet to stop from 70 mph under full throttle when braking than with no throttle, about 88 additional feet when braking from 100 mph. IIRC drivers training instructs the many ways to stop a vehicle should something like this happen.
I currently have an affected 07 Tundra and I am concerned but not in any way fearful of driving the vehicle or think that Toyota should be doing anything different than what they are currently doing to solve the problem. The problem was brought to my attention by Toyota late last summer.
I think the question should be what is CTI, the American maker of the pedal, doing to do to help resolve the problem.
How have they been denying it???? I was informed by Toyota last year of the problem as was all of the other owners with affected cars. Do you own an affected Toyota? Because the recall has not made the news does tham make Toyota quilty of denying?
All of the auto makers have campaign recalls on going most all of the time, that is not news.
While we are at it, lets take a moment to honor the king of the Detroit disposables.
The Chevy Chevette
Yes, the Vega was a contender but they didn't build enough of those to fill salvage yards like the Chevette. Most of the Pintos burned.
We did a floor-up restoration of a 67 Camaro during the late 80's and I was frequenting a couple of local salvage yards for pieces. It dawned on me that there was an enormous number of Chevettes in these yards. I started looking at a few because the bodies and interiors on many looked pretty good. I was surprised at the number of them with odometer readings in the 40-50K range.
I mentioned it to one of the salvage yard guys. "Hell we could run this place on Chevettes. They are the ultimate throw-away car. You buy one and it's worn out in 50,000 miles. Then we get it and use it to keep the other poor bastards going for a few miles. Love 'em!"
Leon wrote: ...
AFAICT, building to spec on the originals and shipping a redesigned part...
--
It would seem odd that the the manufacturers that used CTI and are stopping production would submit defective spec's to CTI to start with. Perhaps QC was a problem, from what I understand the pedals wore or broke prematurely.
My 2006 Tundra was recalled in 2007. The Toyota dealer notified me and replaced the front ball joints. And then, sometimes the Toyota dealer can be a pest, trying me to trade for a newer model. Geez, my truck is barely broken in at 16,000 miles. Overall, it's a good solid truck and hope to take it to well-over 100,000 miles. If at the time I was truck shopping, if I did not cut a good deal, I was ready to look at Ford 150s where there are more choices and high demand. I think Ford makes a good truck, certainly better looking than a Tundra.
Why? Things like that happen all the time.
What I've seen indicates they're a wire design, not purely mechanical and (inferring) the failure is actually electronic. That's from news reports which are, of course, inherently suspect on anything at all technical as for getting the details right.
--
I know I'm going to get raspberries from many here, but this IS my theory...... Toyota has decided to allow GM to regain some of their foothold in the market. Those guys have been in bed together for quite a long time and many projects (Tundra, Matrix/Vibe etc...) Industry insiders tell me that gas pedal issue is nowhere near the catastrophe Toyota has made it out to be. I think they are helping out their GM buddies. Call me crazy.
Let's see. How do you spell a raspberry:
"Ppppppfffffffftttttttt!!!!!
Did I do good? :^)
Not enough spray....LOL
THIS is 'good'.
You are right """"""""Ppppppfffffffftttttttt!!!!! """""""""
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.