So, my buddy asked me to burn him a CD and specifically asked that both versions of Layla be on it.
I had not listened to them back to back in a long time.
Being a WoodDorker, I became enamored of the differences between the two.
You have the Normish Layla, which depends on huge amounts of 'Lecktricity and brute force - and then you have the Galootish Layla, which depends on subtlety and expression.
As a concept, it was working for me pretty good.
So, I'm thinking to myself - Normites are more like Rock and Roll and Galoots are more like Folk Music.
Nah, that couldn't be right.
I couldn't imagine Patrick Leach singing Kum-Ba-Ya anymore than I could imagine Norm singing almost anything from Cream (maybe the Grateful Dead - workingman's dead album).
So, where does that leave me?
I have come to believe, through the salvific power of music, that Galoots and Normites are the same people, as Clapton is the same person when he sings either the Electric Layla or the Unplugged Layla.
It is worthy of note that Clapton took a good long time to become unplugged, as do many confirmed Normites, as they age.
But, they are the same being.
So, we not be not either Normites or Galoots, as Clapton does not need be either a Rock and Roller or a Folky - we may enjoy the multiplicity of our expressions of WoodDorking, without fearing that we need to fall in one or another of the major camps.
If Clapton can handle it, so can we.
Damn, I'm glad that we finally settled that.
Tom Watson - WoodDorker tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (email)