You'd think that would indeed be the reason. If it was, it is an EPIC failure because if you Google "titebond iii ultimate wood glue" or just "titebond iii" , either with or without the quotes, I don't think you'll see a single HF link.
You'd think that would indeed be the reason. If it was, it is an EPIC failure because if you Google "titebond iii ultimate wood glue" or just "titebond iii" , either with or without the quotes, I don't think you'll see a single HF link.
Or too much trouble to go after them since the product does not say anything about TBIII. so what if a link directs you to a different brand product.
in all the reviews no one marked the bottle as a con
are people so afraid of the truth now that they censor themselves about a bottle og glue
you will end of with carpel tunnel syndrome trying to use this bottle
i use a small ratchet style clamp to squeeze out the glue
pop the quick release and no problem
No but I googled Titebond iii glue and actually did see a link to a web site that offered other adhesives but no Titebond iii.
I got this as second suggestion
and this
and this
Search engines will focus on all or any one word in the search description. If you put in glue or adhesive along with titebond III you get lots of other hits.
With adhesive instead of glue I got this at the top.
And a little farther down,
And for what it is worth, I went to the HF site and searched Probond glue, and Elmer's wood glue
Here is the result.
It's interesting that probond returns 0 matches, yet titebond returns 1.
Maybe the builder of the search database assumed more people are familiar with the titebond brand vs. the probond.
Electric Comet wrote in news:nftn98$hcd$6 @dont-email.me:
How now? In the "Cons" I see:
"Hard to get out" "Hard to dispense" "Bottle cap design" "Poor container"
And of course the review text is full of "won't go thru the cap" type comments.
John
You have of course obtained confirmation from the manufacturer of Titebond that the glue in question is in fact Titebond III, even though Harbor Freight claims it is "acrylic" and Titebond is not acrylic?
HTH
Electric Comet wrote in news:nfqias$hvv$2 @dont-email.me:
I was at a HF today, and out of curiousity popped the cap off the bottle. It kinda looks like Tacky Glue, but may not be tacky. (I didn't touch the glue.) It's in a similar bottle to Tacky Glue too.
Is the HF glue actually tacky?
Puckdropper
Almost everything at HF is tacky. ;~)
+1
Excellent!
That's why they sell these...
Yes, laddie, there is such a thing as acrylic adhesive. There are also urethanes, silicones, urea-formaldehydes, resorcinol, epoxies, caseinates, polysulfides, and a whole large range of others. What of it?
HF = Acrylic Polymer = EZ WATER CLEANUP TBIII = Acrylic Polymer = EZ WATER CLEANUP
------------------------------------------
Your turn...
What, you think the only kind of glue with "EZ water cleanup" is acrylic? And you think that acrylic automatically impiies "EZ water cleanup"? Squirt some methyl methacrylate in your eyes and see how EZ it cleans up with water.
Look, I don't know what your area of expertise might be, but it clearly isn't adhesives and the next dumb-ass remark you make on this thread puts you in my killfile.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilization of sesquipedalian verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualization can be verbalized using comparatively simplistic lexicographical entities.
PLONK!
Welcome to my BOZO bin!
In other words you don't think, you just make noise.
He plonked you, He can't see you.
Nah, they always hang around for the response after a Public Plonking. May even have been a double plonk.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.