Battery power and DAB radio

Unknown, it must be all of 200 years since I listened to an AM transmission.

Reply to
Bod
Loading thread data ...

198 years, perhaps?
Reply to
Mike Barnes

Really? So the noise reduction of FM and the huge difference in audio bandwidth make no differece?

yes, to an extent tiny in comparison with the UK AM system's distortion

it has nothing to do with it of course. Why would anyone be recording stuff while driving along instead of at home? A home tape recorder has far more utility - and sanity.

NT

Reply to
meow2222

I used to listen to R4 LW in Belgium before the days of internet radio. I made a simple tuned loop antenna to get a really good signal.

The only problem was summer pollution by incessant cricket commentary.

Reply to
Martin Brown

A static portable receiver? Or a domestic tuner with decent fixed external aerial?

Sorry to be blunt but that's nonsense.

Then put them in a better position.

That would depend on lots of variables. Rather like recording on a ghetto blaster.

I'm trying to follow your logic but failing. Do you mean a recorder or tape player? If recorder, it would add to the price of the unit - and car radios are built very much down to a cost. Which is why so few have DAB. And it's a facility very very few would ever use.

I do have a car radio that allows you to record to a memory card. Apart from trying it out, I've never used it. But that recording sounded just fine when played elsewhere.

You're wrong there too. Useless in the North of Scotland.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

And none of that applies to DAB?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I managed to get it at St Tropez. Car in the carpark at the beach - everyone was going for lunch and I was trying to diet. So sat in the shade in the car. ;-)

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I did use the word reception. Think about it.

Not in a car.

Where?

In car tape recording was tried. The sound quality level was too poor to be acceptable. You get massive interference spikes as you drive along from a variety of sources with AM and FM. I was involved in the trials. Maybe DAB is better for this, but the signal is badly corrupted by the encoding/decoding process and subsequent analogue filtering which is used. LW works in Scotland if you have a decent external car aerial. Try it!

>
Reply to
Capitol

Right. Sound like you needed some engineers involved. In my job as a sound recordist I've recorded lots of audio (and pictures) to tape inside a moving car. With absolutely no problems. Including VHF radio mics.

There's no reason why 'your' recording should be any different to listening 'live' to the car radio.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I'll check my diary to confirm.

Reply to
Bod

Thats blasphemous that is;!..

Repent now!!...

Reply to
tony sayer

In article , Dave Plowman (News) scribeth thus

I think that got a bit out of context from the original. Take that to mean FM and DAB from a RF point of view regardless of the modulation in use;!...

Reply to
tony sayer

I think there is a worthwhile difference, and I'm surprised you don't. Haven't used AM on a car radio for many years.

Reply to
RJH

But really? In the majority of cars, does it matter to most listeners?

Not saying that makes it right, and the UK implementation of DAB has been a shameful dog's dinner.

Reply to
RJH

Interesting. I only use DAB in my old car, and generally only 'light' music when I'm not listening to R4. The audio installation is my own and it's far better than most. But I've never noticed the effect you refer to.

Once you decide to introduce a lossy data reduction system, there will always be artifacts. Maybe so rare you'll not hear them - but they will be there. Obviously some are better than others.

What annoys me about the DAB thing is those who are now apparently so worried about its sound quality totally ignored it at launch. To the point where it was a total flop. Only after the station choice was greatly increased (requiring a data rate reduction) did it gain at least some acceptance. It's true the tuners were very expensive to begin with - but so were other 'Hi-Fi' bits.

When you mention to the average man in the street who only ever listens to radio in the bedroom kitchen or car etc, that DAB has poor audio quality, they think you are a crank. They may have experienced poor reception - but that's a different thing.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

In the English-Scottish border country, in a car, R4 LW is often an absolute mess (because you get all three transmitters at once). A radio with a ferrite rod aerial can be somewhat better, as you can null out at least one of the signals.

Reply to
Ian Jackson

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.