In the Polaris pool cleaner thread the subject of variable speed pool pumps came up. Which got me thinking about them again because a friend who has a pool with a single speed pump is considering options. Doing a bit of research, here's what I have concluded and I wanted to see if anyone has addional thoughts.
First, it looks like because of the design of the variable speed permanent magnet motors, they are inherently more efficient so you use about 15-20% less energy even at full speed.
Second, the biggest savings in energy come from slowing the pump down, reducing the flow resistance. That means you can run the pump for say 4 times as long, at 1/4 the flow rate, move the same amount of water, but save 70 to
80% or so in energy.However, the price of these pumps is very high. A complete new pump runs from $900 to $1200 dollars online. The next obvious problem is that they typically have only a 1 yr warranty. I found an online story where a guy bought a Pentair Intelliflow one where one of the two small control boards failed shortly after the warranty ended. He says Pentair will not sell the replacement board as a seperate part or take pumps back for repair. He would have to buy a whole new pump. It looks like Jandy, another major manufacturer, does sell parts, but the equiv part for their pump would be $400.
So, this got me to thinking. It appears to me the biggest part of the energy savings can be obtained by just going to a dual speed pump. And since my friend has a working pump that is about 5 years old, I'm thinking the most cost effective solution is to just replace the motor with a dual speed motor. We could do that for under $300.
With the variable speed pump, assuming we bought the lowest cost one, by my calcs, with the energy savings it would take almost 4 years to break even. With the dual speed motor, it would take less than 2 years. The pool is seasonal, used 3.5 months a year. And it looks to me like the additional savings in energy going with the true variable speed pump is only about $50 more a year over the dual speed. And then what happens if the fancy electronics on this motor, which sits outside all year, fails at say year 3, 5 etc?
The only other advantage of the variable is you can fine tune it to run at exactly the speed you want, but I don't see a compelling need for that. Also, there aren't any utility rebates available here that would alter the equation. So, it seems for this app, the variable speed makes no sense. If you had a pool running year round, higher cost electric, rebates, etc, then the results might be different.
So, swap out the motor for the dual speed for $300? Any other thoughts, issues I missed?