Puron vs. R22 in new AC unit

Page 1 of 2  
I'm replacing my central air and have gotten estimates for one w/R22 and one w/ Puron. The last guy said he'd go w/R22 because of the higher costs of 410A and that it would cost more to repair. Also, he doesn't like it because of the higher pressure it's under, and he said the units were less reliable and would have more costly repairs.
I've looked at past posts, googled for info, but it's hard to get an objective opinion. I'm in Georgia so the AC gets a lot of use. I may stay in the house only 3 more years, and the repairs/costs would be someone else's headache, but then again, would the 410A unit be a better selling point in 2010? And if I end up staying until 2020, would I have to replace the AC again to the newer refrigerant?

10-15 years and which may ultimately cost more due to older technology.
Advice and opinions welcome. Thanks, mcnick
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Get another air conditioning contractor's opinion. R22 and R410 are both excellent refrigerants. But, time is taking a toll on R22. It will be around longer than you and I care about, but the cost will be higher. Hell everything costs more anyway, doesn't it.
And today, most R410 units are more efficient than their older counter parts.
The R410 units are just as reliable, and more efficient. Soon, the refrigerant cost for R22 may be higher than R410. Get two more opinions from contractor's.
--
Zyp

< snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com> wrote in message
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Tell the last guy to go back to school, and learn how to deal with and get certified for R-410a. In the mean time, look for somebody that actually knows what they are doing. In 2 1/2 years, you won't have a choice. Rheem is shutting down their R-22 equipment assembly lines in December 2007. You can do what you want, but FWIW, I haven't even offered R-22 systems in the last year. R-22 is gone by the wayside.

Like I said, by January, 2010, you won't have a choice.

In 2004, the availability of R-22 was reduced by 35% and the wholesale price tripled. in Jan 2010, R-22 will be cut back an additional 65%, in 2015 R-22 will be cut back another 90%, so in 7 1/2 years, the availability of R-22 will be almost non existent. Yes there are some "drop-in" replacements, but using them will void any compressor manufacturers warranty. If in 5 years if your R-22 system needs to be gassed up, be prepared to pay $100/lb or more.

There are those on here that would disagree with me, but for the most part those who do disagree, don't have the training, or hands on experience with R-410a
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

waaay cool. I'm sittin on 4 pallets of R22. You paying attention Rich? this is better than the stock market! All the more reason to keep on installing R22 units!
You do the 410, I'll stay with R22 equipment til there aint no mo. :)

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Hey Go fish! Great to hear you have 4 pallets of the stuff. What's that, 6,000 lb.s? What's your phone number?
--
Zyp

< snipped-for-privacy@gonefishin.net> wrote in message
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

1-888-662-6484
-Ask for Zoey....
--



Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

OOPS LOL
1-888-662-6482
--




Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

I disagree, but you already knew that. :-)
BTW, I do have the training. You knew that too. :-)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

oh but we will have a choice. watch rheems market share plummet.
personally I don't know of any consumers who are excited about the idea of not having a choice, regardless of what the product is.
with you putting all your eggs in rheems basket, it sounds to me like you're the one without many choices ! :)

along with all the potential cutomers you passed up by not offering them a choice!!

such as that to defend your position.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

You will have a choice until January 2010

I don't know of any customers that are excited about the rising cost of R-22 either. Until 2000, the customer didn't have a choice, it was R-22 or nothing.

I could sell lesser brands also(Payne, Bryant, Luxaire, Armstrong, etc), but why would I want to??...... The other brands cost the same.

The only ones I am passing up are the ones that want it cheap. In the last 6 months there have been several contractors go out of business because they were selling 13 SEER equipment at 10 SEER prices.... there will be more to follow.

I said "for the most part", *NOT* "everybody", and certainly not everybody on here.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Speaking of.... not only are refrigerants changing... but....
Does everyone know that their analog T.V. will be junk come 2009? All of the broadcast stations will be converting 100% to digital. If you want to keep your analog T.V., it'll cost ya. You'll have to purchase a 'converter.'
--
Zyp

"Noon-Air" < snipped-for-privacy@comcast.net> wrote in message
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I knew that..... already got it covered :-)

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

It keeps changing. As of right now. They are gonna wait till all the people who have the 1950 9" black and white model of TV dies so they aren't deprived of viewing. Meaning there is no firm date anymore. AARP is actually fighting the change over. A few screwing it up for the majority again. They have an old black and white they need to swap back to radio. sheesh
--
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/index.xml

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@gonefishin.net wrote:

isn't it like trying to sell a car with a carburetor in the days of fuel injection? I went with Puron no brainer.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Oil is the problem. R-22 is the better choice because of it. The POE oil is composed of alcohol, carboxylic acid and an inhibitor with water as a by-product. (Why it's Hygroscopic) Moisture or high temperatures can break the oil down and it will revert back to alcohol and carboxylic acid. Industry is trying to find a different oil. The pressure sucks too.
--
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/index.xml

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:59:24 GMT snipped-for-privacy@gonefishin.net wrote:

Not to worry. I bet we'll eventually be going back to good old propane (R-290) and other hydrocarbons. Propane is a (currently illegal in the USA) drop in replacement for R-22.
http://www.memagazine.org/jan07/features/rebirth/rebirth.html
"Europeans, especially in the north, tend to see air conditioning as a luxury, and home air conditioning units are simply not the norm. Perhaps for this reason they are less concerned about the flammability and toxicity issues that have stymied the expansion of propane and ammonia use in the United States. In Switzerland, 50 percent of residential heat pumps currently run on propane, and in Germany nearly 100 percent of refrigerator/freezers run on isobutane."
In addition to being dirt cheap, environmentally sound, and potentially more efficient than chlorine and/or fluorine based refrigerants (http://www.mtprog.com/ApprovedBriefingNotes/pdf.aspx?intBriefingNoteIDH2 ), hydrocarbons work like hand and glove with standard oils and have none of the acid forming properties (and are therefore more tolerant of moisture) of the mainstream refrigerants of today.
So, people with R-22 units already have an alternative - just not one that is legal, or agreeable to service techs who like to smoke on the job. ;)
Of course, people are easily scared to death of 5 lbs of flammable gas in their A/C tubes. Many of these same people then store gas grills with 30 lb propane cylinders in their garage without worry.
Mike Shell
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

I only skimmed the article, but nowhere did I see that propane is a "drop in replacement for R-22".
I don't have the P/T/V charts for propane. So can someone with real experience, like kj or noon answer?
Is it? And if it is, what sort of impact would it have on the business if some agency suddenly said, "HEY! Let's legalize propane for R-22 repairs!"?
LLoyd
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Ignore the environuts. They neglect to mention that europe uses the little dorm refrigerators and don't hold as much as ours. They could give a shit about safety or anything else. It's all about "natural" refrigerant. Their goal is to eventually have us all living in mud huts. Screw europe. Our ancestors left that backwards cesspool. This won't be the last time you see one of these idiots posting the same dribble.
--
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/index.xml

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

I worked on a freezer fishing boat a few years ago that had a self contained deck freezer with two ten ton 208/3 Manurope R22 hermetic compressors, running on Propane as the refrigerant. Went to the Chevron and got a twenty pounder to top up one circuit and pressures were in the R22 range. Charged it till the SG cleared and left real quick. Found out after that automotive propane may have moisture in it. I wouldn't want to be on board if they had a severe burnout that blows the terminals off that tincan.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:49:27 -0400

Probably not any significant degree. If anything, the ever increasing complexity of HVAC systems will ensure that HVAC techs will be in great demand, irrespective of the type of refrigerant (even if it was air). Furthermore, if an average Joe should attempt to load in moisture-laden non-refrigerant grade "BBQ gas" into his system, there will be plenty of business for those with vacuum pumps to clean it all up. Finally, the flammability concerns will scare some (and perhaps rightfully so) to "leave all A/C work to the experts".
I could even envision profitable and worthy "inspect your evaporator now before it leaks and becomes a blow torch" campaigns.
The ever changing "Freon" by Dupont et al. is only for *their* business interest. IMHO, if anything, the every increasing demands on HVAC techs to purchase new equipment raises the cost of doing business and reduces their bottom line. I don't have any hard numbers on this, maybe someone else that does could verify, or debunk, this opinion.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:03:58 -0400

Yeah, there better not be air or moisture in there. I don't have any data, but I assume that any oxygen in a propane laden environment will eventually react with the propane (as I think is the case for propane/methane released into the atmosphere, although it might take about a decade to oxidize). Of course, water and CO2 are the by-products.
Refrigerant grade propane will have to be much more pure than run of the mill "BBQ gas". In some places, common propane has a lot of other hydrocarbons mixed in (butane, etc.).
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:24:12 -0400

It really doesn't matter. Digital or not, I've come to the conclusion that there is not anything on worth a darn anyway. Hi-res crap is still crap. The only reason they are pushing it quickly is because there are some big players that want to use the current TV spectrum for something else. None of it has anything to do with what people want as far as TV goes.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:12:51 -0400

I agree with you that Europe is under the spell of environuts - and we do have our share of them here. For example, to ban R-22 on the basis of it being a greenhouse gas is insane to the say the least - consider for example the amount, in lbs, of methane that comes out of the average person's rear (or as a result of beef production) versus how much R-22 their A/C leaks annually. In light of this, R-22 is a non-issue. However, we in the USA have our own, different, brand of nuts ("safety nuts", "greedy nuts", "stupid nuts"). All of these "useful idiots" are just drones to be exploited by intelligent powerful interests who know better.
As far as us having broken away from and being superior to Europe goes, I used to believe this, but I think the internal problems of our once great USA are growing so fast, and becoming so obvious, that I fear we are no longer the envy of the world, but rather becoming a laughing-stock. :(
Mike Shell
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.