Wouldn't it be nice..

several e-mails pointed out that 'rap music' is oxymoronic as well. Next time you will see a C.

Reply to
Robatoy
Loading thread data ...

Hear, hear!

Reply to
Robatoy

Back to normal.

That's good anyway.

:-))

Re-run the CD and say a few Ommmsss.

It's working for me now too.

I'm thinking he slipped a digit. Tis all.

Reply to
WillR

Meaning that I have none cause I did?

Be gentle Bob. I hope it's not what you mean. But if it is -- you're welcome to your opinion. I will try to improve.

Reply to
WillR

I was raised with none, but I still agree with you. You make a lot of sense.

Best wishes.

Reply to
WillR

Nodding is ok as long as they don't nod off. I hope I don't put anyone to sleep.

Dave

mac davis wrote:

Reply to
David

All rather ironic considering the original poster's identity. A BAD identity, at that.

scott

Reply to
Scott Lurndal

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:01:55 -0400, the inscrutable WillR spake:

Who dat? Cousteau?

At LEAST you could spell our names correctly.

P.S: Jewelcome.

========================================================= Save the Whales +

formatting link
the whole set! + Website design and graphics =========================================================

Reply to
Larry Jaques

Some of those flamefests and arguments were, and can still be, entertaining ... hitting the next key on 37 individual "thank you" posts, never.

Reply to
Swingman

Can I infer from your words, that it is NOW acceptable to you for one to post his/her thanks without being thought of as a bandwidth hog? Wouldn't it be a sad commentary on today's culture that a "thank you" would be perceived as rude?

(I'm one of those who still can't figure out why threads with obviously non-woodworking subject titles still receive angry posts [as has this thread] from those who feel it's their duty to complain that "OT" was not added to the title. If the subject says something like "Hey, how about those Mets?", why would anyone who gets irritated at OT subjects waste their oh-so valuable time to read AND respond? It seems their objection is to time wasting, yet they take the time to bang out a rude interjection. That's counter-intuitive to me.)

Dave

Sw>>doesn't cross their mind. As you've read already - they won't make the > > time >

Reply to
David

Hello BAD. Nice troll. Missed you.

--

******** Bill Pounds
formatting link
Reply to
Pounds on Wood

Sheesh! Everyones a critic these days. LOL

Reply to
WillR

I think he said that times change. :-)

Not too many. Kind of enjoyed the thread. Learned some more.

Reply to
WillR

Don't infer anything, except that Bob Dylan was right. :)

Can't argue with you there.

Reply to
Swingman

awww chucks, you lug, you..*soft punch on the shoulder*

Reply to
Robatoy

In with the good air, out with the bad air.

MOTHER OF PEARL!!!! May 6!!! 2005!!! Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy in a theatre near ME!!!

Okay..all is well.... the trailers and clips are an absolute blast!!! . . . . . . out with the bad air . . . . . . .

42
Reply to
Robatoy

BAD... if that is you - a tip o' the hat!

Bob S.

Reply to
BobS

He always knew where the hot buttons were, and never hesitated to stomp on them. He caught a bunch'o them this time.

--

******** Bill Pounds
formatting link
Reply to
Pounds on Wood

been a busy boy lately. can't really keep up with the wreck I started a thread about varnish and got some replies but for a variety of reasons couldn't reply right away. if that's indecent, well too bad.

Reply to
bridger

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.