One guy tells the truth and you want him hanged?
Ali Obama and his corrupt administration (and socialist democrats in
general) get huge sums of money from BP so they can buy their elections.
In turn Obama gives BP passes to violate safety regs put in place to
prevent this shit, regulations that Haliburton cringes at and recommends
not to ignore, but Obama and BP ignore anyway.
Next, BP, whose safety records are so freaking bad even Leon, a rec
woodworker, not an oil muckity muck, or corrupt government hack, or
corrupt president, knows sucks the big one, fukks up everything and
begins to pollute the earth.
Then consider it was the corrupt government that forced them to drill
over a mile of sea water to begin with.
Then when the Obama administration doesn't lift a finger to reduce the
effects of the spill on the environment, other than to refuse help, for
example from the Norwegians who offered giant oil sucking ships, or fire
proof oil booms from a company in Connecticut, or give permission to
build sand barriers to keep the oil they refused to suck up from the
wetlands, you want to shoot some no name no one that managed to tell the
truth in public... Yeah, that makes sense...
Please don't tell Obama what comes after a Trillion!
And the Bushes and Cheneys never took any oil money? Never bought
Do you have ANY idea how stupid you look?
BP gave large dollars to the Obama campaign to get him elected. Bush
and Cheney were not even in the running, two term limit for Bush, you
No, you seem to be the one stuck on stupid!
Bush is NOT in the picture, they received no money to run for election
because they were NOT in the running. It was the Obama regime that
issued the wavers to BP, not Bush. It is the Obama regime that threw
road blocks at early efforts to minimize the disastrous effects of their
Got Change: Democratic Republic ======> Banana Republic!
Mean, and not politically correct, but absolutely true.
LJ--always happily single while misery is all around me.
Peace of mind is that mental condition in which you have accepted the worst.
-- Lin Yutang
Well, yeah. They differ only on the margins.
"Both socialism and communism are based on the principle that the goods and
services produced in an economy should be owned publicly, and controlled and
planned by a centralized organization. Socialism asserts that the
distribution should take place according to the amount of individuals'
production efforts, however, while communism asserts that that goods and
services should be distributed among the populace according to individuals'
needs." [In socialism, a doctor earns more than a common laborer; under
Communism, they earn the pretty much the same.]
A socialist economy has room for small amounts of capitalism; a Communist
society does not allow ANY private economic transactions.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.