(sorry if this is a repost -- my first try seems to have been lost in >cyberspace) >
>I was looking around for inspiration, and I found this piece:
>
>formatting linkancestors ! That's an ugly thing.
Find a copy of Gustav Ecke, and see what it was supposed to look like.
It's a nice piece, and it turned out to be a good example for something
>I've been wondering about. In this example, the body of the piece is one
>wood (or ply with veneer) and it is border with a mitered box around it.
Veneer _is_ plywood. Don't sweat it. 8-)
Using plywood is perfectly acceptable for a large flat surface, and it makes movement a lot easier to handle.
Now for $4,000, maybe there's a question about the fitnes of ply....
So how do you avoid tragedy from wood movement in this piece?
By studying traditional Chinese furniture design. They had a climate that gave a lot of trouble with this, and they did it in a way that's both entirely different and considerably more sophisticated than Western styles (and did it all several hundred years earlier). Chinese joinery is incredible stuff - absolutely no fear of complexity, and beautiful workmanship too. I don't even begin to understand it, but if you ever have the chance, take a look at a good antique collection _after_ you've read some cross-sectional drawings (because you'll never see the joint lines otherwise).
MoFA in Boston have had good exhibitions.
But even ply has *some* movement, right?
Some, but it really is small enough to ignore on a table top.