There've been some threads wandering around the Wreck lately about the finer points of printing.
Well, I'd like to ask some questions of the printing intelligentsia that have been bothering me for some time.
When I was in college, I was on the student newspaper and we ran our columns in 8 point by 11 and a half. That was the standard and we didn't question it, we just did it.
It seemed a reasonable enough size to run things at and no one ever complained, to my knowledge.
I'd personally be happy to read things at that size any day.
Why is it then that, when I have the flu and am least able to tolerate directions on my medicine that are less than what I would call standard size, that they are written in what I would guess to be 4 point type and in a sans-serif font that would drive the healthiest eye crazy?
Is this a conspiracy of the young and healthy against the old and infirm? Do they package medicines intentionally with instructions written so small as to be indecipherable by anyone who is not a sharpshooter?
And, while I'm on this, does the tamper-proof packaging have to also be human-proof. Is the packaging created by twenty-something year-olds who have no clue as to what it means to be both visually and coordinationally impaired while under duress.
I've tried my best to rip open packaging that was, allegedly, intended to be friendly - only to find that I must get sharper objects than I am capable of dealing with - when ill - in order to break into the packaging.
It's fuggin' ageism and I don't think they should let packaging engineers who are under fifty work on any of this stuff.
That's it. I'm going to bed now.
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker (ret) Real Email is: tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet Website: