A few weeks ago, I bought a Unisaw w/side table legs (no side table top) an
d Unifence, off Craigslist, for $400.... gave it to my brother. Decided to
order complete mobile base for it and decided to order mobile bases for my
2 unisaws, as well.
Four packages arrived. One package was severely damaged and had missing pa
rts. The return and replacement procedure, by Amazon, was pretty quick and
easy, as per their online return service.
I've never had to return an Amazon item, before, so I'm pleased with their
service and this online transaction.
*While waiting for the mobile bases to arrive, I made a side table top (for
mica on 3/4" ply). I gave him a miter gauge, also, an extra one I had. Th
is saw should help facilitate any woodworking I or Jonas does for him, with
out having to cut things, here, then haul the stuff there.
My brother's woodworking skills are severely lacking. During a pause in su
rgery, once, we were discussing the idea of having MD (sic) behind one's na
me.... one of the nurses brought up the subject, with the idea being, a Dr
should be intelligent enough to perform other tasks (somewhat efficiently,
maybe), via self teaching in a different discipline. I commented that Bern
ard Fife had MD behind his name. No one knew what I was talking about, so
Andy and Barney were attending a convention in Raleigh. Barney sign the re
gistry and the attendant replied, "Welcome, Mr. Fife. Oh! I'm sorry, Dr.
Fife." Andy signs in and sees Barney's signature, then walks over to Barne
y and asks, "What's the MD for?" Barney replies (with his famous smirky sm
ile), "Mayberry Deputy."
MDs aren't so "special", afterall! My brother thinks (sic) he plays good g
I bought my Unisaw from Amazon. The delivery went without a hitch, or
so I thought. It turned out the fence rails were shipped in a second
package that I didn't get. I called Amazon, who was *right* on it.
They contacted the trucking company, who tracked it down, and
delivered it a couple of days later. Amazon was all over them until I
got it and even called back to make sure I was happy. I was suitably
impressed. I'd not hesitate to make a major purchase like that from
On 8/24/2014 11:05 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Amazon.com definitely knows how to do it right.
I've made several big ticket purchases that required delivery other than
by USPS/UPS. Each and every one went off without a hitch even though in
one instance I was paying for the product and shipping it cross country
to be installed elsewhere. All went smooth as silk.
What I really like - and I've never been the beneficiary of their
efforts - is that they track questions posed by potential purchasers of
an item and they (Amazon) will forward the inquiry to folks who have
already completed a purchase of the item in the past and solicit them to
provide an answer to the potential customer's questions.
How good is that? And they don't censor the responses. I recently
responded to one such inquiry and gave an honest answer about the
product which was very good. I also happened to be aware of a promotion
currently offered to anyone making a direct purchase from the
manufacturer that knocked about 40% off the price. I spelled that out
in my response/review and they posted it in its entirety even though it
likely cost them a sale or two.
Also, for whatever reason, their standard, free shipping seems to arrive
in the same or less time than other seller's goods do when you pay for
expedited shipping. Read somewhere that by the time you receive your
email confirmation of the order, the goods have likely been pulled from
the warehouse and are being packaged for shipment.
When I ordered a 55" TV from Amazon their "local delivery" service
brought it in a truck, brought it in and unboxed it and tested it before
I was asked to sign the "received" form.
I was impressed too. BTW, I know 55" is considered small these days,
but this was 3 years ago.
Yeah, the same Samsung I bought is under $800 now. I think I paid $1150.
I have observed lately that Intel doesn't sell their old processors
They want to sell their new ones and at higher prices than in yesteryear.
On another note, someone wrote yesterday that Comcast is one of the
few companies that treat their best customers the worst (in pricing).
I found that it interesting in that it conflicts with the way that other
do their pricing.
Intel's marketing model is absurd. It's shocking that they've been
able to keep it going for three decades. They are a one-trick pony,
however. That model doesn't work outside the PC business. Every time
they try getting broadening their base, they fall flat on their nose.
It would be interesting to see the detail behind that. Do they mean
they're raping those who have pay-channels more than those who have
the minimalist service? Well, yeah! My employer likes to make things
that other companies with lots of money want to buy and I like to work
for those with money, too. ;-)
On Monday, August 25, 2014 11:49:37 AM UTC-5, email@example.com wrote:
They do it because they can. American consumers are the laziest, most loud
mouthed, self entitled sheep weenies imaginable. What would happen if sev
eral hundred thousand people finally quit Comcast? And say that happened fo
r a few months in a row?
What????? And be without T.V. and movies on demand?????
I know, I know. No one you know is a major offender because they only have
the basic services and none of the premium channels.
Cable subscribers deserve the treatment they put up with. I have to think
that in every Comcast management meeting (as well as Time Warner) the execs
just laugh and chuckle all the way through the meetings. In their wildest
dreams they could probably never have IMAGINED a business model where year
after year of poor service, bad programming, spotty feeds, constant price
hikes and on an on an on... would created a national giant of subscribers t
hat can't wait for a new season of "their shows".
I have never had cable in my entire life. Never. Never wanted it. 5 to 6
channels of crap was enough even thirty years ago, and I had no idea what I
would do with 100 more. I have seen good programming on cable TV, but it
is sparse. And probably worse now than ever, with literally hundreds of ch
annels on the cable/satellite feeds.
I didn't say I don't watch recorded entertainment. When we all went digita
l a few years ago, I went down and bought a high def antenna and a digital
converter box. I don't get a lot of the channels I used to, and don't get
NBC at all. Small loss. I wanted the antenna to get This Old House, The W
oodright's Shop, Nova, Frontline, POV, The American Experience, and my real
vice... 24. With those channels on board, no need for anything else on my
slate of couch sitting.
Now, with replayer sites everywhere, paid internet sites everywhere, there
isn't much use for cable or satellite. I don't know how their economic mod
els will hold up, but supported by the folks that gladly pay their monthly
subscriptions to "Keep up with the Kardashians" the are doing quite well.
A subscription to Netflix will get thousands of movies you can stream and D
VDs you can have delivered to your door in about 3 days of ordering. And yo
u will get thousands more with Amazon Prime. More still with Hulu Plus, et
c., and even with all of those combined you won't hit a normal cable/satell
Better yet, I have watched hundreds of hours of documentaries on YouTube.
There are also some old movies, old TV shows, a fair amount of European con
tent, tons of instructional videos and reviews, foreign films, and all mann
er of other content, including "best of" clips from a ton of TV shows, a lo
t of history documentaries, etc. ALL FREE.
So who is getting raped? To me, the whole cable/satellite issue is just Co
mcast, Time Warner and their cronies shearing the sheep that are lined up a
s far as the eye can see giddily waiting their turn to be cut. Bitching in
dignantly about things to friends and family is the American way, and there
is little action after the chin music stops. This isn't any different.
I did my part in clipping the cord a few years ago (as announced here)
and barely noticed a hiccup. The $10 set of RCA rabbit ears work well
(for most channels). The more expensive antennae people have developed
are mostly more "cosmetic". Anyone considering the latter may do well
to try the $10 solution first.
The person (in another forum) who wrote about "best customers being
treated worse" was making a contrast to other services such as airlines,
where frequent flying get you a discount. With Comcast, the longer you
are a customer, the less-likely you are to be getting a "discount",
I used to think of cable as a "necessity" too. But that was before the
Internet. If I had to make a forecast, it will be that cable tv will
become more like the Internet--in some interactive sense. Can you
imagine Comcast buying YouTube? Scarey, huh? :)
Speak for your own situation, only. Try shooting an antenna at a
transmitter 90 to 95 miles away, with two large chunks of earth directly
between you and the transmitter's antenna. I have to have a narrow band
antenna of at least 17 db gain, and a good amplifier to have a chance. I
got some plans off of the internet for a Gray-Hooverman antenna that fits
the bill and is compact enough to use in your attic or on a chimney mount
mast. Even then, one of the major networks is tough to get in on some days.
Yes, that's true. There is a website where you can type in your
zipcode, or address, and see all of channels you might expect to
receive. It also shows the distance to the stations. As you know, an
amplifier is another matter all together, and doesn't really improve
your "reception" at your house, but powers the signal to your tv--at
least, to the best of my knowledge.
When I bought my antenna for $20, it claimed to be an HD antenna. It worke
d OK, but was flaky from time to time, and during big storms (when I might
be inside watching TV) it was dicey, too. I did more research and bought a
better antenna that is mounted on top of the house, 8' in the air. I orie
nted it using this website with a buddy of mine that helped me get it point
ed dead on to get the channels I was interested in
and still don't get <all> the channels available if I keep it where I can g
et my documentaries on PBS. I also have DSL, with their "Premier" plan, wh
ich is still quite slow. It works well 95% of the time, and when it doesn'
t, I do my paperwork.
Yes, that is obviously a better antenna. I read about antennas for 2
days before I bought the RCA one for $10.99. A roof-top antenna is in
another category--offer a better "line-of_sight" (I think that's the
right word) to the source of the signal.
Swingman has one, and I am probably going to get one, IIRC the mud flap
technology antenna. Looks like a large mouse pad that you hang one the
wall behind a picture or TV.
My current, electricity amplified, HD antenna works great except for the
fact that out of the 60+ over the air stations that we get in Houston
only 2 channels are in English. ;~(
We never watch OTA television any longer, but when we did, we found that
with the switch to digital broadcasting, the picture quality was
outstanding in our location compared to what we'd endured for the entire
time we have lived here.
60-65 air miles from the City of Chicago, even with a hi-gain antenna
with a powered booster, amplified distribution and a 40' tower with
rotor, quality of reception was generally mediocre at best.
When they flipped the switch and got rid of the analog signal it was great.
You may be surprised.
Can't believe this thread.
Mohu leaf antenna.
Think it was about $35, and I get 1080p HD OTA in Houston, much better
picture than cable since there is no signal compression.
I have Apple TV in Houston, just bought a Roku box for the lake house TV
yesterday, and was actually heading to Best Buy in Hot Springs this
morning to buy another Mohu leaf to see how/if it works here.
Only thing I miss with no cable here at the lake house is a live news
feed. Streaming Aljazera and SkyNews just don't cut it.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.