We're in agreement that hobbyist woodworking has grown a ton, and that Norm has had an impact, and I'll grant that equipment started getting more affordable at about the time Norm came on the scene. I'm not sure, however, whether the growth of the hobby (and Norm's popularity) caused the availability of affordable machinery, or whether the hobby has grown because the machinery became affordable, with Norm's popularity coming as a result of the growth of the hobby. Perhaps a bit of both. Regardless, the machinery has relentessly gotten cheaper (in inflation-adjusted terms) during that period.
Well, I suppose I am. I was just saying that IMO it's not a bad thing that a hobbyist can now buy a new 20" stationary planer for a tiny fraction of his/her salary when that tool would have cost a major chunk of a years salary a few decades ago. When that Parks planer sold for $1000, $8000 per year was a really good yearly salary. A new planer today is a much more affordable proposition than it was in 1960. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me that this greater affordability for the masses has come along with some quality reduction.
Well, I'd have to either build another building or get rid of something big. Then I could start looking :-)
Tim Carver snipped-for-privacy@twocarvers.com