So should we be using celotex?

I suspect there is more to this than there seems at first glance. PIR foam without any fire retardant additives burns moderately though not as fast as PU foam which unmodified burns like a firelighter. Both produce dense black smoke with copious CO and traces of cyanide in it. I'd be more worried about the hot soot and CO to be honest.

I happen to have some rigid PU building insulation foam (ICI prototype stuff) from the late 1960's in my parents loft. I took a piece and tried to set light outside (taking appropriate safety precautions). It had one of the earliest fire retardant formulations in it (which actually makes the smoke even more toxic if it burns). The backing paper burned off and the surface of the foam charred but that was all. I was quite surprised since I was worried that the foam might have been original raw batch without any additives. If they could make PU foam resist fire at that level back in the 1960-70's I am sure they can make PIR do the same.

Snag is that the blowing agents have changed and some today may well be using pentane (which is itself a flammable gas).

However there is still a possibility of someone buying a cheap grade that is only suitable for cavity wall insulation where it is surrounded by inert brick/breezeblock walls on either side excluding the air and then strapping it to the outside of a block of high rise flats.

Structural timber doesn't catch all that easily unless you are very very unlucky (once a fire takes hold all bets are off). Paper and cardboard and thin wooden furniture are much more vulnerable. Very old foam settees from the pre fire retardant era are potentially lethal.

Now is good time to check that yours has a fire certificate stitched into the underside of the cushions (especially if you are a smoker).

It might be appropriate to ban the sale of the cheapest nastiest variant which is only safe to use *inside* the cavity of an inert brick wall or behind plasterboard (or at least add warnings to that effect).

I notice Celotex have voluntarily stopped selling their RS5000 grade as used on Grenfell tower.

Reply to
Martin Brown
Loading thread data ...

Quite - for a fire to take hold, the insulation material would, I'd have thought, be the least of your worries. In my case:

On solid walls, mechanically fixed behind 12.5mm plasterboard. There's simply nothing to burn so I can't see how it would add to a fire. Once hot enough and exposed, there is the issue of poisonous gas, but I think the house would be pretty much gutted by that point;

Ground floor, between joists, fixed with fire retardant foam. Assuming the fire started in the cellar (quite a few electrical bits and pieces down there, so possible) I'd have thought if anything it would inhibit the spread of fire by protecting the floorboards - until the point that the fire had reached such a heat that the foil fails, the foam melts, and the floorboards are exposed. In the meantime, the joists can smoulder but there's not that much showing to actually burn;

In the roof space, between rafters, fixed with fire retardant foam, faced to the inside with plasterboard, open to the roof space. The fire would have to have spread from another property, or timber in the roof space would have to in some way catch fire, maybe from an internal fire. Again, I'd have thought the insulation would in the short term inhibit the spread of fire because the timbers are less exposed.

I suppose they could look to developing something completely inert, even if that does effectively turn the home into an oven-furnace.

But as things stand, I don't see PIR as a prime source of fire hazard in low rise (< 4 storey). Timber and furnishings and other 'developments' like laminates would be a bigger problem, and households should make sure they have working fire alarms fitted in the first instance.

Reply to
RJH

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.