Small petrol engine - cylinder head bolt torque?

Apr 16, 2009 31 Replies

If you look on the various covers, you will find a 17 digit number ( in 3 blocks) stamped into the metal. My engine was made in April

1967 I learnt from these numbers which in my case are stamped on the carburetor side of the fan housing. If you search the B & S website diligently enough all the info is there - having said that I did find a number for the manual for mine but couldn't get a download.

In the end I emailed B & S UK - and of course immediately found the info for myself - and they came back impressively quickly with the head torque I was after.

Another useful site is

formatting link
formatting link

I'd check again. The bolts on my SD1 cylinder head are approx 3/8 and go into aluminium threads. 70 ft.lb.

A rule of thumb is using the correct ring spanner rather than socket set will give approx the right torque with a good pull. You couldn't achieve

140 lb.ft doing this.

They're 7/16" which is not even remotely "approx 3/8".

How come nobody appears to be able to read the units properly? in-lbs != ft.lb, it's a factor of 12 different.

(you're at least the third person to make this mistake on this thread, and I think the other two I've seen have indeed gone "D'oh" or some such equivalent).

snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk...

Thanks Clive - isn't that what caused one of the Mars landers to come a cropper ?!!

Rob

Err, 7/16 against 6/16ths on this sort of discussion? You're being picky again...

But in any case makes it all the more obvious the 140 lb.ft is nonsense.

Came late to the thread. However, in defence, the normal way to quote torque figures for this sort of app in the UK was lb.ft.

Mars Climate Orbiter, pounds force instead of newtons.

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Rob G saying something like:

It was common enough here too, for values under 15~20ft/lbs, depending on the specifier's whims. Round about that kind of figure you'd be on a smaller torque wrench because the larger ones wouldn't be accurate enough.

I've never seem lb.in used for engine stuff though - although my experience is only really with older UK cars. Lb.in is used in auto boxes for some things - I've got a torque screwdriver specifically for this.

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Dave Plowman (News)" saying something like:

Hours of fun can be had when Haynes mis-appropriately use the wrong units (fairly obvious) or even just give the wrong figures in the right units (not so obvious, but explains why so many cam holders on older Suzukis are stripped), especially on alloy castings.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required