Ring Main cutting wires or not?

Is it a good idea in a new ringmain to try not to cut the wires, but just cut the sleeves back and fold the coppers back on themselves?

If so then what to do with the double sockets which have two terminals for the earth wires?

[George]
Reply to
DICEGEORGE
Loading thread data ...

No one in the real world ever tried to do this to my knowledge.

Reply to
Tim Watts

In an ideal world one could argue its "better", and the kind of area where a DIY installer can afford to lavish the extra time on it. I am aware of some who have done it, but I don't think its very common practice.

Generally (some dodgy Chinese USB / Gadget sockets excluded [1]) you only need make connection to one or the other as they should be electrically joined in the socket. The exception to that would be when using "high integrity earthing" on circuits that are anticipated to have a high earth leakage current when in normal operation.

[1] ISTR bigclive had a video of a double socket with additional USB where each half had its own earth terminal.
Reply to
John Rumm

You might have a problem doing that at the CU. And the riser feeding that just uses screw terminals.

How to you fit earth sleeving without cutting the conductor - unless both cables enter the box at the same point?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

very marginal improvement in safety

strip them at the same point. But I wouldn't bother.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Don't see how that helps. If sleeving is needed it must cover all the exposed conductor.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Isn't it a requirement to do it like this when a MEB conductor passes through a terminal?

Reply to
Graham.

I assume that you are referring to bonding the gas and water using just one cable.

Reply to
ARW

They have, and they posted about it on this newsgroup.

Reply to
ARW

ISTR Andy G posting about it?

Reply to
John Rumm

I have done it a few times on completely new ring circuit installs.

The first time was 20 years ago in a computer room for lots of PC-type computers stacked on rows of shelves (not rackmounts) where the walls were lined with MK sockets on MK Premier trunking. I didn't want contact resistance adding up with number of sockets, so I carefully stripped and folded back double about an inch of conductor at each connection. 5 ring ciruits IIRC. These were all stranded singles.

A few years later when I rewired my parents kitchen with two ring circuits, I did the same there, but using T&E. It's a bit more fiddly and you need to feed a loop of T&E in through a single backbox punchout to get the sleeve over the folded CPC. It was a bit of a game I set myself, but I wouldn't go anal about it in a domestic situation - there aren't likely to be enough sockets for it to seriously matter.

Did same in my own kitchen rebuild a year or so later.

This all predated sockets with two earth connections.

Reply to
Andrew Gabriel

I've certainly done it.

Reply to
newshound

Earths shouldn't normally be carrying much current, and don't loosen themselves. Just cut them.

Reply to
newshound

Isn't it a requirement to do it like this when a MEB conductor passes through a terminal?

Reply to
Graham.

Yup. The alternative is a dedicated wire to each service.

Reply to
John Rumm

Well - I'm surprised...

I did not, and my loop readings were well within spec with a very good margin.

Reply to
Tim Watts

This is a bit like whether to fold over the ends of wires before screwing them down. ISTR reading once on here that the sharp fold was outside of the cable minimum radius spec and therefore (technically) not adding anything.

Reply to
Scott M

aha - folding solid copper often breaks it, which must be worse than not folding, but folding stranded wire in plugs seems better, especially when the wire's thin and holes big, should the ends be folded and when? [george]

Reply to
DICEGEORGE

I fold stranded when it's loose in the terminal, to ensure better contact and packing.

Reply to
Tim Watts

I've done it on occasion. Whether I'm in the real world might be debated :)

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.