"Oh, I wouldn't know, we only set policy, we don't monitor it!"
"So you can't say whether it has done any good?"
"Of course it's done good, we wouldn't have brought it in, otherwise!".
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
J
John Rumm
IIRC there was a question asked in the house recently on the apparent rise coincident with part P. A search of Hansard will probably turn up something.
There are figures available and well documented for the effects of shock and the implications of shock current and duration of exposure:
formatting link
RCD protection offers very much more than a "feel good factor" - unless you include the ability to breathe and absence of ventricular fibrillation as "feel good" ;-)
Note also RCDs are used not only to lessen shock risks, but also as a earth fault protection mechanism. A TT install with a 6 ohms fault loop impedance could end up sinking 40A for an extended period of time into a protective conductor without tripping a typical 32A MCB on a power circuit. This would (in the absence of the RCD) result in at best cable damage, and possibly fire.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.