Realistic claims for solar pv

Apr 30, 2019 Last reply: 7 years ago 141 Replies

I use a 40w panel to run a Oase Solar 700 pond pump, both are now around 10 years old. On full chat according to the makers figures it will shift 700L an hour using 8watts but that would be max 2m head . From about now to the September in conjunction with an 80 amp hour leisure battery it ran the water feature for quite a few hours a day and some pond lights till about 11pm till a time switch turned them off but there wasn?t much reserve if there were some cloudy or rainy days. Later I installed a relay coupled to one of those tiny battery charging panels so when the conditions allowed for some solar generation it closed the circuit from the pump to the battery .That stopped the pump flattening the battery, the solar charge controller would have switched it off eventually it I didn?t want it to go that low. From about October to May the charge controller took more power than was being generated so the system got mothballed for the winter. If I was doing it again I would definitely go for a larger panel as they are much cheaper relatively than when I purchased mine. As it I have since got mains to that area of the garden and the battery failed a while back so I have removed the charge controller and battery and the panel is now connected directly to pump. Sun comes out , Water feature runs.

There are quite a few solar pond pumps systems advertised , the Oase pump one was quite expensive 10 years ago and many of the complete systems advertised now are a lot cheaper. I suspect I could pee more than most of them. For reliability and to work it will not be cheap.

GH

Very likely. If they get the frequency correct we could have a useful sine wave:-)

>

I have only seen my PV panels hit rated output only rarely and only for a short period.

The KWp is only achieved when the sky is totally clear, the weather is cold and the sunlight is @ 90deg to the panel I have 8Kw of PV, generates just under 8Mwh/year. It all depends on orientation and shading (if any). My situation is almost ideal.

They deteriorate as they age. (1%/year allegedly)

Nobody has a viable/economic solution to dispose of the nuclear waste.

Drivel. The wind blows all the time. It just moves about. Maters are improving as the East West grid is built up.

Good summary, which makes my point quite nicely. The contracts with (so-called) renewables ought to have specified that the onus would be on *them* to make up the power shortfall when the wind doesn't shine etc.

Oh don't worry, I occassionally dabble in the various Brexit threads.

SteveW

So not a lot of use

Its the bean counters who insist.

Given that nuclear has extremely high fixed cost (loan repayment on caspex) and maintenence that is irrespective of how much power it produces and the fuel cost is essentially bugger all, you run it all the time for any income you can get for it.

But thee are difficiult concepts for Leftycunts to grasp. Even one dimensional thinking is hard for them,

>

The worst small DC motor I have ever tested was around 50%.

Spend a little and you are up in the 75%+

If you get a quite big one , run it on a higher voltage and gear it down it is even better.

Tell me Harry, why don't we use sailing ships any more?

Andy

Oh dear. Harry?

He once was conned into buying solar panels IIRC.

Twice actually and it appears to have paid off for him.

Show us some better load figures then

Its not uncommon for the whole of Northern Europe to be becalmed for many days in a row.

The same reason. Because the wind moves about s*it-fer brains.

Exactly so. They have long paid back the capital cost in FIT payments and electricity saved.

Plus, in Summer, they run my electric car for free. And in most of Winter with a little foresight

Notice the dopey whingers here too stupid to install them. Or too poor and and idle.

They will be gibbering shortly about moral values. You watch. (How can a socialist possibly have moral values?)

...... in the UK. You have examine the entire connected grid.

Are you saying there is no point in reducing CO2? Got to be all or nothing?

John only addressed subsidies as regards energy. That's not what you said.

All so easy, isn't it? Except we are incapable of designing and building such things ourselves. So have to go cap in hand to China etc. Who are going to make damn sure they get as much profit from it as possible. And likely control over 'our' energy.

This is obviously what you rabid brexiteers meant by bringing back control.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required