>
> >> >> > I'm not confused about what a duck looks like or its name. I leave
> >> > that to the likes of you.
> >
> >> All yuo have said is that if it lokos like a duck, quacks and walks
> >> lioke a duck then it's a duck. Not all of us would be that easily
> >> fooled, by a toy duck.
> >
> >If you are confused by a toy duck looking like a real duck, I've no doubt
> >there is a branch of Specsavers nearby.
>
> But how would he find that, rather than say a car wash, given he can't
> differentiate between a real (walking and quacking) duck and a toy one
> (even doing the same)!
Because I'm not as stupid as you, it's pretty easy to fool the stupid. Show a person a picture of a duck and ask them what it is and they'll say a duck, while I'll say it's a picture of a duck it is't a real duck it;s a picture of a duck, while you say no it's a real duck everyone that hasn;t asnwered teh Q are teh majority and they haven't said it's a picture so therfor it is a duck. And yuo can use one of those duck calls as much as you like but you still won't convince me that a picture of a duck is a real duck. And the original phrase was it swims like a duck NOT walk like a duck.
of course this is from the person that said the referedum ballot question was who wants a change?
A toy duck is a toy duck.
> He is one strange / odd duck that's for sure. ;-(
>
> Cheers, T i m
At least I can tell the difernce what is your problem(s)