Re: GB news.

Jul 20, 2021 Last reply: 5 years ago 4 Replies
Saved reading
Jump to replies (4)


Fredxx snipped-for-privacy@nospam.co.uk> wrote


>> The Natural Philosopher wrote
>>> tim... wrote
>>>> Dave Plowman (News) snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk> wrote
>>>>> JNugent <jennings& snipped-for-privacy@fastmail.fm wrote
>
>>>>>> I want 1950s / early 1960s style neutrality in broadcast media. >>>>>
>>>>> You must be incredibly old if you took an interest in such things >>>>> then.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think that people (normal people) did take an interest in it
>>>> at the time, because it as seen as normal
>>>>
>>>> perhaps people just hanker back to that normality
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think we should be careful.
>>>
>>> Looking at today's generation's easy acceptance of green bullshit as
>>> fact, I think back to my youth and realise that there was much then
>>> that I didn't question either. My parents lived through The War, as
>>> we understood it to be spelled...and were comfortable with the fact
>>> that of course the BBC wasn't telling the whole truth, but was part
>>> of the war effort churning out wartime propaganda.
>>>
>>> What has changed is the complete takeover of the media from a centre
>>> right position to a more or less Marxist position, although it's
>>> couched as benevolent socialism.
>>>
>>> This is the final nail in the coffin from what was a mildly
>>> benevolent elite of educated and experienced people to an new elite
>>> of indoctrinated and classist people that literally hates the plebs
>>> and popular culture and wants an EU style dirigiste  government that
>>> dictates cultural norms as well as the law.
>>>
>>> In essence where you used to get your morality from the Church, and
>>> it was nothing to do with the Law, now you get it from left wing
>>> pressure groups via the Guardian and the BBC and the push is to
>>> encapsulate it in law.
>>>
>>> Hate crime? since when has it been a crime to hate? Why is it never
>>> the hate filled Left that get prosecuted for it?  When Maggie died
>>> the cool thing was to revel in hatred of a politician.
>>>
>>> The BBC selects what it considers 'important' - wall to wall woke
>>> social issues these days - and tells us what we *ought* to be
>>> thinking about it.
>>>
>>> Sadly GB news is selecting those same issues although it is at least
>>> presenting them in a far more balanced way.
>>>
>>> The real challenge is to select and promote other issues - let's have
>>> a real critique on climate change or renewable energy, perhaps >>>
>>> At least Nigel Farage started off by saying 'look, this is what is
>>> happening with illegal immigration, why are we sweeping this under >>> the carpet?'
>>>
>>> A story that no one else is featuring.
>>
>> Quite, no on is addressing the instability and violence in countries
>> where many are fleeing from,
>
> Because it isn't possible to address that.

We shouldn't have poured arms into countries like Libya and Syria. We shouldn't have decimated Iraq and created ISIS.


> and our hand in creating and perpetuating this instability.
>
> Bit late now with Israel and Syria etc and not
> even possible with Afghanistan and Iraq.

It is too late. We should have left these countries alone in the first place.

Fredxx snipped-for-privacy@nospam.co.uk> wrote

We didn’t with either and they would have had the same problem with instability and violence regardless anyway.

Iraq was never decimated.

That would have happened regardless of Iraq.

There would still have been instability and violence there.

There always was everywhere. Some like western europe did eventually come to their senses and those other places may do eventually too.

formatting link
We also gave various 'defence' equipment. Be in denial as much as you like.

Much of ISIS was formed from those banned in participating in Iraqi politics. It was formed directly as a consequence of the Allied invasion of Iraq.

Considerably less. Iraq was stable and kept Iran in its place.

Fredxx snipped-for-privacy@nospam.co.uk> wrote

That was after the instability and violence had started well before that.

It wasn’t what produced the instability and violence.

Ditto.

There is no denial, yours is mindless rewriting of history.

BULLSHIT. And the only one doing any banning of participating in Iraqi politics was Saddam.

More pig ignorant bullshit.

formatting link

That last is more pig ignorant bullshit.

And clearly wasn’t true of Afghanistan or Syria or Libya.

Quite, Saddam was dead by the time ISIS had reached any strength, where ISIL had effectively split into al-Qaeda and ISIS.

And you're showing your typical ignorance.

Where the West sowed the seeds of instability. Do you deny that the West poured arms into fighters opposed to the governments of Libya and Syria?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required