Which is maybe just as well in this case. As you clearly don't understand the points at issue.
In this instance you see, the problem has arisen precisely because, unlike what you and your friends erroneously claim, all decisions in the EU are NOT made by the EU Commission. In this case the deal was rejected by the democratically accountable Wallonia Regional Assembly. Whose decision was binding on the Belgian Government. Democracy in action in other words.
Given that this gives a good example of EU Democratic accountability in action, something of which you claim to be in favour, it's rather surprising that you should be crowing quite so triumphantly about the outcome.
Once article 50, of which you are so in favour has been invoked, the UK will then find itself in a similar position to that which Canada finds itself in now. Except that what will be at issue won't be agricultural produce.
Rather what will be being decided, behind closed doors will be how quickly the French(Paris), German (Frankfurt), and Irish (Dublin) Governments, doubtless intent on carving up the UK financial sector amongst themselves will decide, as they're bound to do, to deny the UK any financial Passporting facility.
So that any financial services, banking, insurance, foreign exchange etc. currently transacted between the rest of the Word and the EU through London, currently among the Worlds largest financial centres, will in future be routed through Paris, Frankfurt, or Dublin
The market dislike uncertainty, as the current level of sterling shows. A situation which won't improve for years to come, if at all.
If the EU is as doomed as you and your friends proclaim, then with the UK inside the EU it would be the Euro that would take the hit and not sterling.
Instead you and your friends seem determined to wreck the UK economy and destroy the livelihoods of people presently employed, unlike yourself as is all too obvious given the amount of time you waste online, in the vain hope of bringing your ill-informed prejudices to fruition.
HTH