> >>>> In terms of climate change, that would be totally inappropriate! >>>
>>> What climate change would that be, then?
>>
>> The change that's happening now, but people hard of thinking like you
>> keep denying.
>>
>
> Scotland would still be under 2 miles of packed ice and snow if it
> wasn't for natural, cyclical climatic change, which have occured
> many many times over the last 4 billion years.
But nowhere near as quickly as change is happening now.
You have absolutely no way to know that. Nor does anyone ales, Its fraud to state otherwise.
Nothing in even the last millennial records gives temperature resolution down to 3 decades. We have for example no idea how fast the Roman or mediaeval warm periods or the holocene optimum - all of which were warmer than today - occurred.
Nor any explanation as to why the little ice age ended years before CO2 started to rise.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required