RCD Keeps tripping on new installation

Might explain why the bulbs don't last very long.

NT

Reply to
meow2222
Loading thread data ...

Lsd ?

>
Reply to
Bill

But if N an E are connected upstream and downstream the neutral current will be shared between N and E. The L current will be the full amount so the RCD will see an unbalance.

Reply to
<me9

With a single RCD for the whole installation it is then one circuit (with subcircuits) from that point. Tripping of that circuit will cause danger of no lighting. therefore an RCD supplying all circuits is non-compliant.

It is also not a good idea.

Reply to
<me9

He must have lost his medication!

Reply to
<me9

Circuits should be slplit to avoid danger.

Well you need two then, just like two combis.

Reply to
<me9

What does that make you! Certainly not sane and intelligent.

Reply to
<me9

I would agree that RCBOs can offer a better solution, at a *much* *greater* price.

Reply to
<me9

True, however if you have an *additional* N to E short *after* the RCD, then you have a parallel neutral path around the RCD.

Reply to
John Rumm

Indeed - and not often worth the expense IME. You can go for a pragmatic middle ground with "high integrity" 17th edition style CU[1]

Put any high trip risk circuits on RCBOs, then share others around the other two or three RCD groups.

[1]
formatting link
Reply to
John Rumm

formatting link

Put the whole house on 100mA RCD and then use 30mA RCBOs for selected sockets

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Yes, solely because there's a N-E fault downstream.

NT

Reply to
meow2222

I don't believe there is much of a hazard with only one RCD but there is an inconvenience.

Reply to
ARW

That does not meet the 17th edition.

Any cables less than 50mm below a wall/partition surface and not mechanically protected require a 30mA/40mS RCD:

522.6.6 - Defines mechanical protection 522.6.7 - Requires RCD where above is not met, references 415.1.1 415.1.1 - Stipulates RCD with 30mA trip and operating time not greater than 40mS at 150mA
Reply to
Tim Watts

I think the word "shall" has a similar meaning to the the word "shall"

And your point is?

Reply to
ARW

Quite. But there are lots of makers just as good or better than Wylex.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Not an electrical hazard, I agree - but if all the lights go out when it's dark, there is likely be a hazard in the occupant negotiating their way to the CU.

Reply to
charles

Being in the dark is NOT a hazard. There are battery backup lights for being in the dark. An electrical hazard means harm by electricity.

An RCD is the last line of defence to prevent bodily harm.

What if a digger rips up the cable in the road!!!

British Standards are RECOMMENDATIONS. The Building regs are LAW. Even the building regs are full recommendations as well.

I wouldn't hire you.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

This man is senile.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

This one is an old hippy.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.