OT. Ten percent.

In message , at

05:32:55 on Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Man at B&Q remarked:

But the funds were predicted to grow as a result of those "returns" (which most people expect from 'investments') and the raid reduced the net returns (increasing the treasury's take) and hence tore up any earlier predictions about the final worth of these investments.

Reply to
Roland Perry
Loading thread data ...

Just like FIT payments

Reply to
The Other Mike

Actually I'd have said making you pay now for what you've already had on tick.

Reply to
Tim Streater

It was a tax on dividends which themselves were only a few % of the fund.

Maybe I was lucky, I had good advice from the company pension scheme trustees about what it really meant, and acted accordingly.

MBQ

Reply to
Man at B&Q

In message , at

07:53:05 on Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Man at B&Q remarked:

Dividends are an important contributor to the growth in pension fund value, especially for the sort of shares that big pension companies "invest" in.

Reply to
Roland Perry

In message , Man at B&Q writes

Do you mean fall off a boat (they didn't) or raid pension funds (they did, both private and public)

Reply to
bert

Same difference

Reply to
bert

But a few % on a year on year basis, so over say 30 years adds up to quite a bit.

Reply to
bert

It's passing quite a lot of it on to borrowers.

Reply to
bert

In message , Tim Streater writes

I haven't got anything "on tick". Pensioners still pay taxes.

Reply to
bert

If you owe any money, you are making a fortune at my expense.

Reply to
harry

formatting link

Like I said, I more than pay my way.

Reply to
Huge

Perhaps not you personally, but the UK population as a whole.

Reply to
Tim Streater

No more than you need to account for and plan for due to other influences on returns over the same time frame. So not really a big issue.

MBQ

Reply to
Man at B&Q

The funds remained intact. He did not do a Cyprus on them. It's very different.

MBQ

Reply to
Man at B&Q

Whether or not other influences are bigger or smaller is irrelevant. This is one specific adverse factor caused by a grab on the funds by the last Labour government as they started running out of cash long before the credit-induced banking crisis.

Reply to
bert

In message , Tim Streater writes

Oh I totally agree with that general sentiment, both personal and government debt around £1trillion each in the UK.

Reply to
bert

Speak for yourself! Even with my partner we don't owe a trillion...

Reply to
polygonum

ISTR it amounted to about 5 billion a year. And it's probably no coincidence that company pension schemes all seemed to evaporate shortly afterwards.

Andy

Reply to
Andy Champ

But we'll see that back when they re-sell the assets after we're out of the shit

Reply to
Andy Burns

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.